Engines - long

[Jerry Budd]

Matt,

You forgot the 400 rpm idle.   : )

BTW - I'm currently flying a motor just like the one Bob describes 
below (and it's not made by OS).

Thx, Jerry


>What I would love to see is a lightweight, priced right, fuel 
>burning, rear exhaust powerplant that will turn a 22-24" dia prop at 
>around 6400 rpm, like the electric set-ups. Some gassies could work 
>but are too heavy.
>
>Matt
>
>With a pump like the 140RX would be nice =)
>
>But I'll settle for RE right now.
>
>-Mike
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>Bob Pastorello
>To: <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>discussion at nsrca.org
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:05 PM
>Subject: Re: Engines - long
>
>As much as I *love* the OS 1.60, and have it working very 
>satisfactorily (no - I am NOT sponsored, either!), the 1.60 in a 
>rear exhaust would really be a significant improvement in permitting 
>lots of designs to use the 1.60.  The bigger crankcase, better 
>bearing life, lower nitro and more power, reliable starting....like 
>Richard said - we just need a RE version.
>     Help me out, Jason!!!
>
>Bob Pastorello


-- 
___________
Jerry Budd
mailto:jbudd at qnet.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.