Engines - long

[Bob Pastorello]

uhhh...Jerry....that would be?????????

Oh yeah....WEBRA....hmmm
(still costs twice the OS 1.60 <VBG>)

Bob Pastorello
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jerry Budd 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:43 PM
  Subject: Re: Engines - long


  Matt,

  You forgot the 400 rpm idle.   : )

  BTW - I'm currently flying a motor just like the one Bob describes 
  below (and it's not made by OS).

  Thx, Jerry


  >What I would love to see is a lightweight, priced right, fuel 
  >burning, rear exhaust powerplant that will turn a 22-24" dia prop at 
  >around 6400 rpm, like the electric set-ups. Some gassies could work 
  >but are too heavy.
  >
  >Matt
  >
  >With a pump like the 140RX would be nice =)
  >
  >But I'll settle for RE right now.
  >
  >-Mike
  >
  >
  >----- Original Message -----
  >From: <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>Bob Pastorello
  >To: <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>discussion at nsrca.org
  >Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:05 PM
  >Subject: Re: Engines - long
  >
  >As much as I *love* the OS 1.60, and have it working very 
  >satisfactorily (no - I am NOT sponsored, either!), the 1.60 in a 
  >rear exhaust would really be a significant improvement in permitting 
  >lots of designs to use the 1.60.  The bigger crankcase, better 
  >bearing life, lower nitro and more power, reliable starting....like 
  >Richard said - we just need a RE version.
  >     Help me out, Jason!!!
  >
  >Bob Pastorello


  -- 
  ___________
  Jerry Budd
  mailto:jbudd at qnet.com
  =====================================
  # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
  and follow the instructions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041004/3436cfaa/attachment.html