Support for Masters Pilots
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Wed Nov 17 17:50:58 AKST 2004
Eric:
I agree. Or, as my kids used to say: If at first you can't fricasee,
fry, fry a hen! <VBG>
Eric Henderson wrote:
> Bill,
> And as you know we submitted it again based on the NSRCA
> members vote of "YES", and again the contest board threw it out.....
>
> If at first......
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill Glaze <mailto:billglaze at triad.rr.com>
> To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Support for Masters Pilots
>
> Eric:
> Your statement below describes exactly the omitted snap roll on
> the Intermediate Schedule. Bill Glaze
>
> Eric Henderson wrote:
>
>> I must have done this snap maneuver a whole bunch of times since
>> 2002. At first you are uncomfortable because you really are in
>> unfamiliar territory. Then it gradually becomes routine as you
>> perfect your timing. Once mastered you will wonder why it was
>> such a big deal.
>>
>> It was designed so that you entered the loop inverted going
>> downwind. This results in you heading upwind and upright just
>> as you perform the snap. This was planned to minimizes the
>> fear-factor and any panic moments.
>>
>> As you get familiar with this maneuver you may actually find
>> yourself adding power before and during the snap. Yes, I
>> said adding power.
>>
>> Adding about 1/4 throttle gives the snap some exit authority. At
>> first you instinctively do the snap with down-glide-power only.
>> The result is often a hard-to-stop-accurately snap. Adding some
>> power seems to give a much better "cone" at the back. I suspect
>> that this is due to the airflow over the tail feathers continuing
>> though the maneuver. Try a few going straight and level and vary
>> your speeds and see if you see what I saw....
>>
>> Also just banging full power after the snap doesn't seem to give
>> as good a climb out as gradually adding power all the way around
>> the remaining half loop.
>>
>> Ref. The length of the 1/4-1/2-1/4 roll, it should be a little
>> bit shorter than a 4-point-roll because it is a 4-point roll with
>> one point missing.
>>
>> Ref. The reverse KE, beware of trying to do super long KE
>> components. It's not a requirement.
>>
>> Nite,
>>
>> Eric.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Ed White <mailto:edvwhite at yahoo.com>
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 11:35 PM
>> Subject: RE: Warning to Masters Pilots
>>
>> This is very consistent with what I've found. The
>> keys for me seem to be speed management and less
>> aileron in the snap than I was using last year.
>>
>> This maneuver is very speed sensitive. Previous snaps
>> in the upright Avalanche or 45 deg down were much less
>> speed sensitive. I'm flying a Focus II, YS 140L,
>> 17-10N prop and find I actually have to carry a little
>> - very little - power above idle into the snap.
>>
>> Though I have yet to make it look very pretty.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>> --- Archie Stafford <astafford at 3states.net
>> <mailto:astafford at 3states.net>> wrote:
>>
>> > This really is not that much tougher than any other
>> > maneuver. With the breaking available today with
>> the
>> > large fuselages.
>> > ...
>> > This is a maneuver that will require excellent speed
>> > management, but when done well is a very pretty
>> > maneuver.
>> >
>> > Arch
>> >
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to
>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041118/7a71567a/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list