Support for Masters Pilots

[Eric Henderson]

Bill,
       And as you know we submitted it again based on the NSRCA members vote of "YES", and again the contest board threw it out.....

If at first......
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Glaze 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:19 PM
  Subject: Re: Support for Masters Pilots


  Eric:
  Your statement below describes exactly the omitted snap roll on the Intermediate Schedule.   Bill Glaze

  Eric Henderson wrote: 
    I must have done this snap maneuver a whole bunch of times since 2002. At first you are uncomfortable because you really are in unfamiliar territory. Then it gradually becomes routine as you perfect your timing. Once mastered you will wonder why it was such a big deal.

    It was designed so that you entered the loop inverted going downwind. This results in you heading upwind and upright just as you perform the snap. This was planned to minimizes the fear-factor and any panic moments.

    As you get familiar with this maneuver you may actually find yourself adding power before and during the snap. Yes, I said adding power.

    Adding about 1/4 throttle gives the snap some exit authority. At first you instinctively do the snap with down-glide-power only. The result is often a hard-to-stop-accurately snap. Adding some power seems to give a much better "cone" at the back. I suspect that this is due to the airflow over the tail feathers continuing though the maneuver. Try a few going straight and level and vary your speeds and see if you see what I saw....

    Also just banging full power after the snap doesn't seem to give as good a climb out as gradually adding power all the way around the remaining half loop.

    Ref. The length of the 1/4-1/2-1/4 roll, it should be a little bit shorter than a 4-point-roll because it is a 4-point roll with one point missing.

    Ref. The reverse KE, beware of trying to do super long KE components. It's not a requirement.

    Nite,

    Eric.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Ed White 
      To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 11:35 PM
      Subject: RE: Warning to Masters Pilots


      This is very consistent with what I've found.  The
      keys for me seem to be speed management and less
      aileron in the snap than I was using last year.  

      This maneuver is very speed sensitive.  Previous snaps
      in the upright Avalanche or 45 deg down were much less
      speed sensitive.  I'm flying a Focus II, YS 140L,
      17-10N prop and find I actually have to carry a little
      - very little - power above idle into the snap.

      Though I have yet to make it look very pretty.

      Ed


      --- Archie Stafford <astafford at 3states.net> wrote:

      > This really is not that much tougher than any other
      > maneuver.  With the breaking available today with
      the
      > large fuselages. 
      > ...
      > This is a maneuver that will require excellent speed
      > management, but when done well is a very pretty
      > maneuver.  
      > 
      > Arch
      > 


      __________________________________________________
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
      http://mail.yahoo.com 
      =================================================
      To access the email archives for this list, go to
      http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
      To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
      and follow the instructions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041118/1307cdfd/attachment.html