Support for Masters Pilots
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Wed Nov 17 17:59:45 AKST 2004
On Nov 17, 2004, at 8:50 PM, Bill Glaze wrote:
> I agree. Or, as my kids used to say: If at first you can't
> fricasee, fry, fry a hen! <VBG>
I had to submit the proposal that takeoff direction was the pilot's
option three times before it passed. We all know what a hazard that's
been.
Ron Van Putte
> Bill,
> And as you know we submitted it again based on the NSRCA
> members vote of "YES", and again the contest board threw it out.....
>
> If at first......
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill Glaze
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Support for Masters Pilots
>
>
> Eric:
> Your statement below describes exactly the omitted snap roll on the
> Intermediate Schedule. Bill Glaze
>
> Eric Henderson wrote:
> I must have done this snap maneuver a whole bunch of times since
> 2002. At first you are uncomfortable because you really are in
> unfamiliar territory. Then it gradually becomes routine as you perfect
> your timing. Once mastered you will wonder why it was such a big deal.
>
> It was designed so that you entered the loop inverted going downwind.
> This results in you heading upwind and upright just as you perform the
> snap. This was planned to minimizes the fear-factor and any panic
> moments.
>
> As you get familiar with this maneuver you may actually find yourself
> adding power before and during the snap. Yes, I said adding power.
>
> Adding about 1/4 throttle gives the snap some exit authority. At first
> you instinctively do the snap with down-glide-power only. The result
> is often a hard-to-stop-accurately snap. Adding some power seems to
> give a much better "cone" at the back. I suspect that this is due to
> the airflow over the tail feathers continuing though the maneuver. Try
> a few going straight and level and vary your speeds and see if you see
> what I saw....
>
> Also just banging full power after the snap doesn't seem to give as
> good a climb out as gradually adding power all the way around the
> remaining half loop.
>
> Ref. The length of the 1/4-1/2-1/4 roll, it should be a little bit
> shorter than a 4-point-roll because it is a 4-point roll with one
> point missing.
>
> Ref. The reverse KE, beware of trying to do super long KE components.
> It's not a requirement.
>
> Nite,
>
> Eric.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed White
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 11:35 PM
> Subject: RE: Warning to Masters Pilots
>
>
> This is very consistent with what I've found. The
> keys for me seem to be speed management and less
> aileron in the snap than I was using last year.
>
> This maneuver is very speed sensitive. Previous snaps
> in the upright Avalanche or 45 deg down were much less
> speed sensitive. I'm flying a Focus II, YS 140L,
> 17-10N prop and find I actually have to carry a little
> - very little - power above idle into the snap.
>
> Though I have yet to make it look very pretty.
>
> Ed
>
>
> --- Archie Stafford <astafford at 3states.net> wrote:
>
> > This really is not that much tougher than any other
> > maneuver. With the breaking available today with
> the
> > large fuselages.
> > ...
> > This is a maneuver that will require excellent speed
> > management, but when done well is a very pretty
> > maneuver.
> >
> > Arch
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 6483 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041118/ed0afddc/attachment.bin
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list