[SPAM] RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote

[Bill Glaze]

Sorry. Should have read District VP's.  Bill Glaze

Bill Glaze wrote:

> Dean:
> Out of curiosity..........will hounding our districe VE's do any 
> good?  they have no vote,as far as I know.  All they can do, as I 
> understand it, is to offer their opinions to the CB, same as you and 
> me.  Am Imisisng something here?  Wouldn't be the first time!<G>
>
> Bill Glaze
>
>
> Dean Pappas wrote:
>
>> So let's publish the voting record in the K-Factor. It's only useful 
>> if we all go hound our AMA dstrict VPs as a result.
>> Dean
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     From: Del Rykert [mailto:drykert at localnet.com]
>>     Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 2:26 PM
>>     To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>     Subject: Re: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>>
>>     Ed....
>>         Sounds great ... BUT...  
>>     We have been down this time a few times before over the years.
>>     Just different magnitudes and with internet is more open forum
>>     for discussion. Some members have a different agenda and follow
>>     what they feel is important.
>>          My suggestion is to make those that vote and control the
>>     issues that guide this SPORT have their voting record posted on
>>     this forum or on the NSRCA web site for us to review and question
>>     the motives behind their decisions. Sort of like the ribbing that
>>     goes on for sandbaggers to move up. It would either drive the
>>     people underground or out of office.  Both might be better than
>>     keep repeating history.  This is only MHO as lame as it may be. 
>>      
>>                            del
>>                    NSRCA - 473
>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>         From: Ed Deaver <mailto:divesplat at yahoo.com>
>>         To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>>         Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:11 PM
>>         Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>>
>>         Having read all the posting on the list on this subject. 
>>         Several things are clear to me and this is simply my take on
>>         things.
>>          
>>         1)  The vote is over.  What's done is done and that's it.
>>          
>>         2)  Some people are mad some are not(human nature is such
>>         that usually only the upset ones voice an opinion ie
>>         lobbyiest success in our capital)
>>          
>>         3)  Their is nothing at this time to be achieved by
>>         continuing to persue th negatives.
>>          
>>         4)  We can however learn from this experience.  More emphasis
>>         has to be placed on calling our AMA District Reps.  A formal
>>         survey is only a document and can be scewed in any which way,
>>         same as a phone poll.  We are again at, the membership must
>>         contact the District Reps to give input.
>>          
>>         5)  As with most activities or memberships, a very few are
>>         passionate and highly motivated.
>>          
>>         6)  Lets do our best to accept these changes, read not agree
>>         with or like, but accept and work towards the next rules
>>         cycle where someone may add a snap into the new Intermediate
>>         schedule and if so wished, add a new rules proposal to add
>>         scoring of L/TO.
>>          
>>         Just my opinion.
>>         ed
>>
>>         Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>             What follows is an exchange of e-mails between Lance Van
>>             Nostrand, the
>>             List, John Fuqua and me. If it comes through as
>>             presented, John's
>>             comments are in blue.
>>
>>             Ron Van Putte
>>
>>             From: johnfuqua at gdsys.net
>>             Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>>             Date: May 11, 2004 8:50:34 PM CDT
>>             To: vanputte at cox.net
>>
>>             From: Ron Van Putte
>>                 **  Klipped 4 reposting..  **
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040512/b6bb14e1/attachment.html