[SPAM] RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote

[Bill Glaze]

Dean:
Out of curiosity..........will hounding our districe VE's do any good?  
they have no vote,as far as I know.  All they can do, as I understand 
it, is to offer their opinions to the CB, same as you and me.  Am 
Imisisng something here?  Wouldn't be the first time!<G>

Bill Glaze


Dean Pappas wrote:

> So let's publish the voting record in the K-Factor. It's only useful 
> if we all go hound our AMA dstrict VPs as a result.
> Dean
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Del Rykert [mailto:drykert at localnet.com]
>     Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 2:26 PM
>     To: discussion at nsrca.org
>     Subject: Re: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>
>     Ed....
>         Sounds great ... BUT...  
>     We have been down this time a few times before over the years.
>     Just different magnitudes and with internet is more open forum for
>     discussion. Some members have a different agenda and follow what
>     they feel is important.
>          My suggestion is to make those that vote and control the
>     issues that guide this SPORT have their voting record posted on
>     this forum or on the NSRCA web site for us to review and question
>     the motives behind their decisions. Sort of like the ribbing that
>     goes on for sandbaggers to move up. It would either drive the
>     people underground or out of office.  Both might be better than
>     keep repeating history.  This is only MHO as lame as it may be. 
>      
>                            del
>                    NSRCA - 473
>     ----- Original Message -----
>
>         From: Ed Deaver <mailto:divesplat at yahoo.com>
>         To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>         Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:11 PM
>         Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>
>         Having read all the posting on the list on this subject. 
>         Several things are clear to me and this is simply my take on
>         things.
>          
>         1)  The vote is over.  What's done is done and that's it.
>          
>         2)  Some people are mad some are not(human nature is such that
>         usually only the upset ones voice an opinion ie lobbyiest
>         success in our capital)
>          
>         3)  Their is nothing at this time to be achieved by continuing
>         to persue th negatives.
>          
>         4)  We can however learn from this experience.  More emphasis
>         has to be placed on calling our AMA District Reps.  A formal
>         survey is only a document and can be scewed in any which way,
>         same as a phone poll.  We are again at, the membership must
>         contact the District Reps to give input.
>          
>         5)  As with most activities or memberships, a very few are
>         passionate and highly motivated.
>          
>         6)  Lets do our best to accept these changes, read not agree
>         with or like, but accept and work towards the next rules cycle
>         where someone may add a snap into the new Intermediate
>         schedule and if so wished, add a new rules proposal to add
>         scoring of L/TO.
>          
>         Just my opinion.
>         ed
>
>         Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>
>             What follows is an exchange of e-mails between Lance Van
>             Nostrand, the
>             List, John Fuqua and me. If it comes through as presented,
>             John's
>             comments are in blue.
>
>             Ron Van Putte
>
>             From: johnfuqua at gdsys.net
>             Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>             Date: May 11, 2004 8:50:34 PM CDT
>             To: vanputte at cox.net
>
>             From: Ron Van Putte
>                 **  Klipped 4 reposting..  **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040512/e728457b/attachment.html