[SPAM] RE: Tuned Pipe.

ronlock at comcast.net ronlock at comcast.net
Wed May 12 05:25:37 AKDT 2004


On a different but maybe related thought -
Ive run an OS 1.40, and a SuperTigre 2300 on a .60 size Hatori pipe
with good results.   Power is not as good as a 1.20 size pipe, but 
both engines ran nicely.

Ron Lockhart
__________________________

>I agree with Dean that I would not expect good results, if not problems.  However, I believe Mike Harrison ran a very similar set-up for a while when he initially converted from running 4C to 2C, as he did not want to/could not modify his airplane for the 2C pipe.  I recall being amazed it worked.  The set-up ran well enough, but once Mike adapted a 2C pipe, he seemed to prefer it.
 
Andre'<
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Dean Pappas 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:17 AM
Subject: [SPAM] RE: Tuned Pipe.


Hello Fausto,
Don't believe everything you read on the net!  I wouldn't expect this combination to run well, and since there are many planes that don't fit the larger diameter two-stroke pipes, you would expect many people to run the setup you describe if it worked well. They don't, and it doesn't. 
Boa Sorte
    Dean Pappas
-----Original Message-----
From: Fausto Henriques [mailto:fausto at alternex.com.br]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:13 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Tuned Pipe.


Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone has tried or is currently using the following set-up with good results. The set-up would be a OS 140 RX, with original OS header coupled to a YS 4 stroke tuned pipe (HATORI #698 FAI Pipe for 120~140-4C). I 've read somewhere on the net that this set up would run fine, although I would not get the power increase as from the 2C pipe. Any comments will be appreciated.
Regards,
Fausto




-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Andre Bouchard <akfai at gci.net>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: Tuned Pipe.
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 04:28:26 +0000
Size: 5483
Url: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040512/fbcfac3a/attachment.mht


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list