Lithium Rules changes
Bob Richards
bob at toprudder.com
Fri Dec 24 10:42:51 AKST 2004
As mentioned in the RATHER LENGTHY document, there has been at least one case where a pallet of batteries being shipped has caught fire after possibly being damaged from handling. It took multiple attempts to put it out. Luckily (this time) it was on the ground.
I think they are primarily worried about the extremely high energy denisty of multiple cells/packs being shipped together as cargo, and being mostly unattended in the cargo hold. Much like the oxygen generators that brought down the People's Airline jet in Florida.
Bob Richards.
Lance Van Nostrand <patterndude at comcast.net> wrote:
so why create a law to constrain only loose, non-rechargable lithium batteries? Who carries these around? This doesn't seem to me to have been much of a risk in the first place. Either there was a freak accident that this law is addressing, or its a foot in the door.
--Lance
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Richards
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Lithium Rules changes
And it does not apply to primary batteries carried in personal luggage for personal use.
Can you imagine all the laptop users and people with cell phones not being able to carry them!
Bob R.
Lem Stevens <stevenslem at comcast.net> wrote:
If I read the CFR correctly, the ban only applies to primary lithium batteries at this point. It does not apply to secondary (rechargeable) batteries. Thank goodness.
Lem
----- Original Message -----
From: John Ferrell
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:30 PM
Subject: Lithium Rules changes
http://www.ulbi.com/whitepapers/RSPA_Interim_Final_Rule_Lithium_Batteries_12-15-04.pdf
http://www.ulbi.com/product-display.asp?ID=50
John Ferrell
http://DixieNC.US
Bob Richards
bob at toprudder.com
http://www.toprudder.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041224/e6397985/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list