Judging questions

[tony at radiosouthrc.com]

Bob:
In the case of a maneuver that only has two loop radii, they both must be alike in order not to get a downgrade.  In the case of, say a square loop, you have four.  So if only any two are alike, the other two would be cause for downgrade.

Tony Stillman
Radio South
3702 N. Pace Blvd.
Pensacola, FL 32505
1-800-962-7802
www.radiosouthrc.com
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Pastorello 
  To: NSRCA 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:10 PM
  Subject: Fw: Judging questions


  The paragraph above that one reads..."Partial loops flown as part of the same maneuver must have identical radii."
      So - my question still stands.....IF all elements MUST be identical, doesn't that CLEARLY mean that the three additional radii following the FIRST radii MUST be the *same* as that first radii?

  Doesn't that mean that the "first loop part" sets the standard of radii for THAT maneuver?
  Somebody help me understand this....Don R. ????

  Bob Pastorello
  rcaerobob at cox.net
  www.rcaerobats.net


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Scott Smith 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:57 PM
    Subject: RE: Judging questions


    4. Both complete and partial square loops must  have corners which are constant and identical radii, i.e., the corner loops must be perfect arcs which are equal in size. Any inequality in loop size or defect in circularity should be downgraded in relation to the severity of the defect.

    I think the key words here are "Any inequality" (and not "Any inequalities to the initial loop segment")

      -----Original Message-----
      From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of mike mueller
      Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 8:34 PM
      To: discussion at nsrca.org
      Subject: Re: Judging questions


      Bob, I totally agree with your point here. Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040805/9e7930ef/attachment.html