Mintor Review

Karl G. Mueller kgamueller at rogers.com
Thu Apr 1 11:37:09 AKST 2004


Steve,

With proper exhaust port timing and setup with a good pipe you will
loose that bet. My bet is that you will gain closer to 20% improvement
in power, of course with more power comes a higher fuel consumption
as well. Most engines are very conservatively ported in the exhaust
timing to run on a muffler as well as on a pipe. Just an other compromise
by the manufacturers.

Karl G. Mueller
kgamueller at rogers.com
     
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Patternrules at aol.com 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 9:49 AM
  Subject: Re: Mintor Review


  In a message dated 4/1/2004 9:28:50 AM US Eastern Standard Time, d.pappas at kodeos.com writes:
    Mintor 140 article, how does it run on a muffler as
    opposed to a pipe. I would expect some loss in power
    but also a loss in cost.
   I don't use pipes on any on mine engines Jeff Hughes and I have been using the Bolly 590r which is a muffler, no tuning head aches, no midrange problems, if you change props, fuel or anything else NON PROBLEMS, I have been running the Mintor 140 with it and it runs super, don't know how much less power you get from just running a muffler but I'd bet it's not over 5%, I use Coolpower 15% fuel.


  Steve Maxwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040401/bb9dcffe/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list