Bigger issues--Long as usual from me

[Bill Glaze]

Jerry:
You are absolutely correct in your assessment of what IMAC did--it's 
almost as if you were there, (instead of out flying pattern!<G>)
Your further statements are in line with my sentiments.

Bill Glaze

Jerry Budd wrote:

> Hi Ron,
>
> I don't believe that AMA "inadvertently" gave the IMAC folks control, 
> they (AMA) simply didn't have any choice in the matter.  The word I'm 
> getting is that the IMAC community was fully willing to break away 
> from AMA if that was what it was going to take to get what they (IMAC) 
> reasonably wanted.  At that point AMA is faced with having some 
> control or no control.  Saying AMA "inadvertently lost control" is at 
> best "spin" and at worst a lie.
>
> I just don't understand why we (NSRCA) are willing to simply lie down 
> and get run over on this by AMA.
>
> Do you have any idea why?
>
> Jerry
>
>
>> As far as I can tell, NSRCA will do all the annex work and the 
>> contest board will only "sprinkle holy water" on our work.  I do not 
>> believe that the contest board members (most are NSRCA members) would 
>> ever put a veto on anything we wanted to do.  It's just that the AMA 
>> hierarchy is unwilling to relinquish any more control over the rule 
>> book than they' inadvertently gave the IMACers in the last cycle.  
>> The process WILL take longer, because it takes time to "sprinkle holy 
>> water".
>>
>> Ron Van Putte
>
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#