Fwd: Rule Change Survey Results

Ron Van Putte vanputte at cox.net
Mon Nov 17 15:40:58 AKST 2003


Guys - Here is the response John Fuqua made to me.

Ron Van Putte

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "John Fuqua" <johnfuqua at gdsys.net>
> Date: November 17, 2003 3:32:03 PM PST
> To: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
> Subject: RE: Rule Change Survey Results
>
> Ron
> You might point out that most if not all board members are NSRCA 
> members and have already seen the survey results.  I do not know what 
> District this fellow is in but you might point out that I only 
> represent District V.  I personnally have received no feedback, one 
> way or the other, regarding this from District V members.  My 
> presumption is that some like it and some do not.  Is this guy like a 
> lot of others who are willing to spend hours discussin but do not take 
> the time to contact their District Rep. 
> I would be more than happy to share the data from an email poll of 
> pattern fliers if NSRCA was to poll on all proposals and collect the 
> Districts they are in.  Much like we did last time.  I found that very 
> useful.  
>  
> You ask the key question.  Have they read the proposals and the 
> rationale that goes with each.
>  
> Keep them coming.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From:Ron Van Putte [mailto:vanputte at cox.net]
> Sent:Friday, November 14, 2003 5:28 PM
> To:johnfuqua at gdsys.net
> Subject:Fwd: Rule Change Survey Results
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From:Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
> Date:November 14, 2003 3:26:26 PM PST
> To:discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Rule Change Survey Results
>
> On Nov 14, 2003, at 12:34 PM, george kennie wrote:
>
> Gee, it sounds like Mr.Fuqua is not even interested in the concerns of 
> our group in spite of the fact that he's listed in my copy of M.A. as 
> being the rep for district 5. I notice that he does not seem to want 
> the rest of the board to gain exposure to the survey results. Could 
> that be because he's the originator of the proposal in question?
>
> He is the originator of the rule change proposal to have 0 or 10 for 
> takeoffs/landings. I also signed the proposal.
>
>
> Does he even monitor this list, which is a voice of a group of which 
> he is a member?
>
> No. There is too much traffic that is not appropriate to his interest.
>
>
> How does he keep up with the heartbeat of his constituents. He must 
> represent a very small geographical district and be able to contact 
> everyone by word of mouth. And this guy is the chairman of the 
> board????? I must be missing something here somewhere!!! Somebody 
> correct my error here. I' ve got to be wrong......(AGAIN).
>
>
> He is like every other member of the contest board. He responds to 
> input from constituents who contact him. He contacted me three times 
> by email today because I contacted him three times. His home e-mail 
> address is johnfuqua at gdsys.net BTW, I don't think that AMA District 5 
> is a small geographic district. It encompasses Alabama, Florida, 
> Georgia, Mississippi, Puerto Rico, South Carolina and Tennessee.
>
> Permit me an aside. If all the effort which went into the hand 
> wringing we've seen on this List about the takeoff and landing rule 
> change proposal went into constructive activity, we could get some 
> real work done in support of NSRCA. Did anyone actually log on Tony's 
> site and read the proposal?
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 4369 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031117/e6f9ec01/attachment.bin


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list