Landings-THE ANSWER
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Wed Nov 12 10:27:03 AKST 2003
Several weeks back John Ferrell suggested a
K-4..........................Bill Glaze
Gray E Fowler wrote:
>
> After seeing all the discussion yesterday about scoring landings I
> went home and could not sleep last night due to all this controversy
> on landings (unrest in the world of pattern causes massive unrest in
> my personal life). At 4am I realized the problem and the answer. We
> need an emergency proposal and a re-vote. Obviously those that voted
> to keep scoring landings ( such as myself) must have been totally
> insane or were just confused, kinda like the 2000 pres election in
> FLA. So now we need to re-hash this and get it right.
> The main problem is the fact that the landing is listed as a K-1. The
> reason so many in pattern and the RC world in general have such a
> tough time with landing is the totally UN arguable FACT that landing
> is a K-5. That why it is so tough to judge and execute for so
> many.....If we just get this emergency proposal thru all problems will
> be solved. Pilots will the pay attention to landings and rush out to
> their local field and practice practice practice this thing we call
> landing. Maybe we can even put in a touch and go and make it a K-6.
> Gosh-I hope this helps.....
>
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031112/5e46e828/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list