Rules proposal

[Anthony Romano]

Didn't I see a link to the proposal's on the NSRCA page?


>From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>Subject: RE: Board Voting
>Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 07:20:07 -0400
>
>P.S. The maneuvers annex proposal was supported by the survey results but 
>due to its impact and complexity was submitted separately by its sponsors, 
>Tony and Ron.
>
>Regards,
>
>Eric.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Henderson,Eric
>Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 7:13 AM
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Subject: RE: Board Voting
>
>
>If it helps, Any changes with Tom Weedon or Eric Henderson as the submitter 
>are those that came as a direct result of the voting in the NSRCA survey. 
>Tom wrote up the rules and wording changes and I did those for the schedule 
>and maneuver descriptions related to that schedule.
>
>We can post them again on this list if you would like?
>
>Regards,
>
>Eric.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of patterndude at attbi.com
>Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 2:08 PM
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Subject: Re: Board Voting
>
>
>Anyone know where the details of each rule change proposal are?  THe 
>shorthand
>in the MA table leaves out the details.  Besides, it appears that NSRCA and
>IMAC (RC precision and RC precision scale) changes are intermixed.  For
>example, it appears that take off and landings will not longer be scored
>for "someone", but I can't tell whom.
>--Lance
> > Matt and All:
> > I agree with your assessment. I sure hope you're right in this case as
> > well
> > Bill Glaze.
> >
> > Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > It's a preliminary vote only by the Board.
> > >
> > > Past history has shown that if it makes through this stage, it usually
> > > passes
> > >
> > > Matt Kebabjian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> ----Original Message-------
> > >> From: Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
> > >> Sent: 05/28/03 09:33 AM
> > >> To: NSRCA discussion <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > >> Subject: Board Voting
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > All, (Particularly of interest to Intermediate Competitors:)
> > >> I just received my copy of Model Aviation.  I noticed on the voting
> > >> results, Contest Board, (page 163) that on RCA-05-17 a favorable
> > >> vote
> > >> was received.
> > >> I take that to mean that the Immelman and snap roll on the 45 deg.
> > >> downline have been reinstated.
> > >> Am I correct?
> > >>
> > >> Bill Glaze
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>
>============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>
>====================================# To be removed from this list, send a 
>message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#