Board Voting

[Bill Glaze]

Lance:
Just at a guess, it must be pattern under change; takeoffs and landings have
never, to my knowledge, been scored in IMAC.
Bill Glaze

patterndude at attbi.com wrote:

> Anyone know where the details of each rule change proposal are?  THe shorthand
> in the MA table leaves out the details.  Besides, it appears that NSRCA and
> IMAC (RC precision and RC precision scale) changes are intermixed.  For
> example, it appears that take off and landings will not longer be scored
> for "someone", but I can't tell whom.
> --Lance
> > Matt and All:
> > I agree with your assessment. I sure hope you're right in this case as
> > well
> > Bill Glaze.
> >
> > Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > It's a preliminary vote only by the Board.
> > >
> > > Past history has shown that if it makes through this stage, it usually
> > > passes
> > >
> > > Matt Kebabjian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> ----Original Message-------
> > >> From: Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
> > >> Sent: 05/28/03 09:33 AM
> > >> To: NSRCA discussion <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > >> Subject: Board Voting
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > All, (Particularly of interest to Intermediate Competitors:)
> > >> I just received my copy of Model Aviation.  I noticed on the voting
> > >> results, Contest Board, (page 163) that on RCA-05-17 a favorable
> > >> vote
> > >> was received.
> > >> I take that to mean that the Immelman and snap roll on the 45 deg.
> > >> downline have been reinstated.
> > >> Am I correct?
> > >>
> > >> Bill Glaze
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#