Nats RPM check - That is better.. RIGHT.?.

[Del Rykert]

Then that would draw attention to someone trying to fudge his/her equipment. If we are all honorable and amongst perfect gentlemen no big deal - RIGHT.?.  
 
     Del K. Rykert
     AMA - 8928 
     NSRCA - 473
     Kb2joi - General 


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: wgalligan 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:14 PM
  Subject: Re: Nats RPM check


  One may also have his engine dialed down some to stay at or below the noise
  threshold too.  So you could get varying results.

  Wayne

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
  To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 2:07 PM
  Subject: RE: Nats RPM check


  RPM's are not a regulation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
  [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Woodward James R Civ
  412 TW/DRP/ACQ
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 2:15 PM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Nats RPM check


  Notice the subject line change :)

  Why don't you measure the RPMS at the same time you take the sound
  measurement in the finals?  You could get prop, rpm, noise, engine, pipe,
  fuel, combos all at once.
  Jim


  -----Original Message-----
  From: David Harmon [mailto:k6xyz at attbi.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 10:48 AM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: RE: 140FZ RPM's?

  Ahhhh....someone that is willing to say it like it is! Thanks Ron.
  I've NEVER been able to get similar rpm's from my engines even when
  right out of the box from being repaired.
  Same prop & fuel and on a test stand too.

  Dave

  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
  On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:24 AM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: 140FZ RPM's?




  Bob Kane wrote:

  > Just measured it the other day, 8400rpm, Mejlik 16X10, Powermaster
  > 30%, OS F plug, temp about 70, 600 feet above sea level. I have two
  > 140FZ's and they run within a few RPM of each other.
  >
  > I was thinking for kicks, it would be fun to measure motor RPM's at
  > the NATS with the same tach on the same day and publish the results.
  > Would remove a lot of variables.
  >

  It looks as though we have a volunteer!

  Seriously, I agree.  It would be nice to remove some of the variables,
  like altitude, temperature, bad memory, BS and hidden agendas and see
  just how some of these engines compare.

  Ron Van Putte


  =====================================
  # To be removed from this list, send a message to
  # discussion-request at nsrca.org
  # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
  #



  =====================================
  # To be removed from this list, send a message to
  # discussion-request at nsrca.org
  # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
  #
  =====================================
  # To be removed from this list, send a message to
  # discussion-request at nsrca.org
  # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
  #

  ============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
  # discussion-request at nsrca.org
  # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
  #



  =====================================
  # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
  # discussion-request at nsrca.org
  # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
  #
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030522/c6b9f7f2/attachment.html