2004 Nat's finals for lower classes
John Ferrell
johnferrell at earthlink.net
Sun Jul 20 15:19:09 AKDT 2003
"That seemed to violate the most basic of tenents for running a contest
which is that you publish the rules in advance. You don't make it up as
you go."
Where I go to church we say AMEN here!
John Ferrell
6241 Phillippi Rd
Julian NC 27283
Phone: (336)685-9606
johnferrell at earthlink.net
Dixie Competition Products
NSRCA 479 AMA 4190 W8CCW
"My Competition is Not My Enemy"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Budd" <jbudd at QNET.COM>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: 2004 Nat's finals for lower classes
> >Ron
> >OK
> >Another Question Did anyone who was in the finals, who would have
> >been cut if 20% would have been used this year end up above the 20%
> >group had it been used this year?
> >Just curious
> >Buddy
>
> I did. I qualified 9th in Masters and finished 7th.
>
> Rusty Fried qualified 10th and finished 6th.
>
> Based on the ~40 entrants in Masters both Rusty and I would have been
> left out of the finals.
>
> Nonetheless, I support the idea of a fixed number, or a % of the
> total entrants, whichever is greater.
>
> The bigger issue is that it needs to be discussed, and decided upon
> in advance of the contest. When some of the Masters competitors
> inquired as to how many competitors would be carried into the finals
> they were told "at least 8, maybe more". That seemed to violate the
> most basic of tenents for running a contest which is that you publish
> the rules in advance. You don't make it up as you go.
>
> So for Masters next year I would propose 8 or 20% of the total
> Masters entrants, whichever is greater.
>
> Jerry
> --
> ___________
> Jerry Budd
> Budd Engineering
> http://www.buddengineering.com
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list