bureaucratic org/Weight Question

[Jerry Stebbins]

That means a 40 lb whatever to dodge, trainers at 15 lbs are bad enough, to be dodging. 
 Seems like that capability already is at the CD's discretion. 
Would be a lot better/safer if we just specified a reasonable number and controlled it that way. 
I also would like to see who, by class , voted what way on those questions.
Jerry
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ronlock 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:46 PM
  Subject: Re: bureaucratic org/Weight Question


  According to the rules survey results , the question on should
  the weight limit be raised received   74 Yes, 111 No, votes.

  There is a proposal to add language to the effect of:
  ~The contest director has option of deleting weight & size limits
  for Sportsman class...such deletion must be published in ...
  advance...model must conform to AMA weight limits.

  Ron Lockhart


    Tom

    I fully understand that it was not submitted by NSRCA. My question was, Has anyone submitted a weight change personally? I also think it would enlightening to know,since the vote margin was close. How many votes For and Against the weight change came from each individual Class? But I don't expect that information will be made available.

    Buddy 



    >From: "Thomas C. Weedon" 
    >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    >To: 
    >Subject: RE: bureaucratic organization! 
    >Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:10:02 -0500 
    > 
    >Buddy, 
    >The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on this list about 
    >a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit change because 
    >the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of three questions 
    >on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a slim majority. 
    >Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit it. That is 
    >your privilege. 
    >Tom 
    > -----Original Message----- 
    > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On 
    >Behalf Of Buddy Brammer 
    > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM 
    > To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    > Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization! 
    > 
    > 
    > Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal was submitted 
    >to AMA by anyone? 
    > 
    > Buddy 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > >From: "Tony Stillman" 
    > >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    > >To: 
    > >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization! 
    > >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500 
    > > 
    > >Troy: 
    > > 
    > >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic pass on the 
    >initial vote. 
    > > 
    > >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An NSRCA past 
    >President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to help 
    >counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out by the AMA 
    >Exec. Counsel. 
    > > 
    > >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in proposals. Past 
    >surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs to be done. 
    >Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also very easy to 
    >just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that! That's the 
    >problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't vote, and so 
    >we end up with what we get. 
    > > 
    > >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy. 
    > > 
    > >Tony Stillman 
    > >Radio South 
    > >3702 N. Pace Blvd. 
    > >Pensacola, FL 32505 
    > >www.radiosouthrc.com 
    > > 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021028/a128c015/attachment.html