bureaucratic org/Weight Question

Del Rykert drykert at rochester.rr.com
Sun Oct 27 15:37:07 AKST 2002


Hi Ron..
      I thought that was already being done in the past as long as the CD gave advance notice of that issue and as long as they were still AMA legal the CD already had that option?.
 
        Del
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ronlock 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 11:46 AM
  Subject: Re: bureaucratic org/Weight Question


  According to the rules survey results , the question on should
  the weight limit be raised received   74 Yes, 111 No, votes.

  There is a proposal to add language to the effect of:
  ~The contest director has option of deleting weight & size limits
  for Sportsman class...such deletion must be published in ...
  advance...model must conform to AMA weight limits.

  Ron Lockhart


    Tom

    I fully understand that it was not submitted by NSRCA. My question was, Has anyone submitted a weight change personally? I also think it would enlightening to know,since the vote margin was close. How many votes For and Against the weight change came from each individual Class? But I don't expect that information will be made available.

    Buddy 



    >From: "Thomas C. Weedon" 
    >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    >To: 
    >Subject: RE: bureaucratic organization! 
    >Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:10:02 -0500 
    > 
    >Buddy, 
    >The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on this list about 
    >a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit change because 
    >the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of three questions 
    >on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a slim majority. 
    >Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit it. That is 
    >your privilege. 
    >Tom 
    > -----Original Message----- 
    > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On 
    >Behalf Of Buddy Brammer 
    > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM 
    > To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    > Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization! 
    > 
    > 
    > Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal was submitted 
    >to AMA by anyone? 
    > 
    > Buddy 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > >From: "Tony Stillman" 
    > >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    > >To: 
    > >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization! 
    > >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500 
    > > 
    > >Troy: 
    > > 
    > >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic pass on the 
    >initial vote. 
    > > 
    > >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An NSRCA past 
    >President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to help 
    >counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out by the AMA 
    >Exec. Counsel. 
    > > 
    > >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in proposals. Past 
    >surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs to be done. 
    >Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also very easy to 
    >just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that! That's the 
    >problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't vote, and so 
    >we end up with what we get. 
    > > 
    > >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy. 
    > > 
    > >Tony Stillman 
    > >Radio South 
    > >3702 N. Pace Blvd. 
    > >Pensacola, FL 32505 
    > >www.radiosouthrc.com 
    > > 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021027/e0ae28e6/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list