Weight Question
Larry Diamond
jed241 at email.msn.com
Mon Oct 28 10:24:28 AKST 2002
Don't think it's a good idea to provide the "By Who's", however, I would be interested in the class breakdown as well.
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Stebbins
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: bureaucratic org/Weight Question
That means a 40 lb whatever to dodge, trainers at 15 lbs are bad enough, to be dodging.
Seems like that capability already is at the CD's discretion.
Would be a lot better/safer if we just specified a reasonable number and controlled it that way.
I also would like to see who, by class , voted what way on those questions.
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: ronlock
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: bureaucratic org/Weight Question
According to the rules survey results , the question on should
the weight limit be raised received 74 Yes, 111 No, votes.
There is a proposal to add language to the effect of:
~The contest director has option of deleting weight & size limits
for Sportsman class...such deletion must be published in ...
advance...model must conform to AMA weight limits.
Ron Lockhart
Tom
I fully understand that it was not submitted by NSRCA. My question was, Has anyone submitted a weight change personally? I also think it would enlightening to know,since the vote margin was close. How many votes For and Against the weight change came from each individual Class? But I don't expect that information will be made available.
Buddy
>From: "Thomas C. Weedon"
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To:
>Subject: RE: bureaucratic organization!
>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:10:02 -0500
>
>Buddy,
>The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on this list about
>a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit change because
>the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of three questions
>on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a slim majority.
>Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit it. That is
>your privilege.
>Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
>Behalf Of Buddy Brammer
> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
>
>
> Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal was submitted
>to AMA by anyone?
>
> Buddy
>
>
>
> >From: "Tony Stillman"
> >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >To:
> >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
> >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500
> >
> >Troy:
> >
> >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic pass on the
>initial vote.
> >
> >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An NSRCA past
>President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to help
>counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out by the AMA
>Exec. Counsel.
> >
> >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in proposals. Past
>surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs to be done.
>Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also very easy to
>just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that! That's the
>problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't vote, and so
>we end up with what we get.
> >
> >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy.
> >
> >Tony Stillman
> >Radio South
> >3702 N. Pace Blvd.
> >Pensacola, FL 32505
> >www.radiosouthrc.com
> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021028/5c777eb5/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list