Weight Question

Larry Diamond jed241 at email.msn.com
Mon Oct 28 10:24:28 AKST 2002


Don't think it's a good idea to provide the "By Who's", however, I would be interested in the class breakdown as well.

Larry
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jerry Stebbins 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:25 AM
  Subject: Re: bureaucratic org/Weight Question


  That means a 40 lb whatever to dodge, trainers at 15 lbs are bad enough, to be dodging. 
   Seems like that capability already is at the CD's discretion. 
  Would be a lot better/safer if we just specified a reasonable number and controlled it that way. 
  I also would like to see who, by class , voted what way on those questions.
  Jerry
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: ronlock 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:46 PM
    Subject: Re: bureaucratic org/Weight Question


    According to the rules survey results , the question on should
    the weight limit be raised received   74 Yes, 111 No, votes.

    There is a proposal to add language to the effect of:
    ~The contest director has option of deleting weight & size limits
    for Sportsman class...such deletion must be published in ...
    advance...model must conform to AMA weight limits.

    Ron Lockhart


      Tom

      I fully understand that it was not submitted by NSRCA. My question was, Has anyone submitted a weight change personally? I also think it would enlightening to know,since the vote margin was close. How many votes For and Against the weight change came from each individual Class? But I don't expect that information will be made available.

      Buddy 



      >From: "Thomas C. Weedon" 
      >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      >To: 
      >Subject: RE: bureaucratic organization! 
      >Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:10:02 -0500 
      > 
      >Buddy, 
      >The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on this list about 
      >a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit change because 
      >the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of three questions 
      >on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a slim majority. 
      >Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit it. That is 
      >your privilege. 
      >Tom 
      > -----Original Message----- 
      > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On 
      >Behalf Of Buddy Brammer 
      > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM 
      > To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      > Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization! 
      > 
      > 
      > Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal was submitted 
      >to AMA by anyone? 
      > 
      > Buddy 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > >From: "Tony Stillman" 
      > >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      > >To: 
      > >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization! 
      > >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500 
      > > 
      > >Troy: 
      > > 
      > >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic pass on the 
      >initial vote. 
      > > 
      > >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An NSRCA past 
      >President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to help 
      >counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out by the AMA 
      >Exec. Counsel. 
      > > 
      > >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in proposals. Past 
      >surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs to be done. 
      >Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also very easy to 
      >just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that! That's the 
      >problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't vote, and so 
      >we end up with what we get. 
      > > 
      > >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy. 
      > > 
      > >Tony Stillman 
      > >Radio South 
      > >3702 N. Pace Blvd. 
      > >Pensacola, FL 32505 
      > >www.radiosouthrc.com 
      > > 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021028/5c777eb5/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list