K-factor- overseas members perspective

Thu Oct 3 15:51:01 AKDT 2002

We will be able to offer a compromise soon. We are planning to have a
monthly K-Factor for our members on the web site, soon. The costs for
foreign members should be low, as there are no expenses involved. I do
agree, that we must always have a printed version. That is our "Flag Ship".
That defines us and makes us what we are. But times are changing and we may
want to think about other communication opportunities as well.

Concerning cost savings, the most effective way to cut costs is to reduce
the number of times we publish per year. Our saving would be considerable if
we published 6 or 8 times a year instead of 12, and our work load would
diminish, giving everyone a small rest from the publishing pressure. We
would still save money if we made the issues slightly bigger. It's the page
setup, printing, and postage that costs. The less often you need to do it,
the more you save.
Tom Weedon

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Nik Middleton
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:52 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: K-factor- overseas members perspective

A most excellent post.  Couldn't agree more.  There is an opportunity here,
but as ever costs are an issue.  If there were some way of receiving the
K-Factor in electronic format in the destination country and then having it
printed, that might be a way forward, then the numbers would be low.

I simply do not agree with the idea that we should go 100% electronic.  It's
not for everyone.  This is born out by the fact that far from killing paper
media, the newspapers are holding their own.

I stopped my membership because I couldn't justify $50+ for a magazine that
mostly contained contest results.  That being said, I know it takes a lot of
effort to write and submit articles.

It's a real issue, but I don't have any solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Koenig, Tom
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:44 AM
To: 'discussion'
Subject: K-factor- overseas members perspective

Hi all,

I've been reading the threads regarding the K-factor with great interest and
finally decided to put in a short burst myself.

I've only been a member since 95 and have actually managed to get several
others signed up down here, but for various reasons retaining those members
is/was another story.

With the utmost of respect to the NSRCA but for the overseas members I see
the K-Factor being the only 'real commodity' that the NSRCA possesses. There
is little else the NSRCA can do for 'us' unless the it takes on a more
'Global' role, which is something I hope to see. Think outside of your own
backyard.

We have our own national bodies etc and our own newsletters, but because of
our small relative size(s) we have never attempted something along the scale
of the K-factor. So why not take on a world leadership role?

Something that you MUST consider is the cost. ALL the guys I had signed up
gave the number one reason as cost v what they got.
You must consider exchange rate here...over the years an average membership
for me has cost between 80 to 100 Aussie big ones. This is not cheap...I
realise the exchange rates are no-ones fault but when you consider that as
overseas members we really get nothing else but the K-factor. We get no
voting rights (not that important anyway ) but I  find it humerous when I
see some people complaining about their 'local' U.S cost.

The number two problem that seems evident in retaining OS members was
'content' of the K-factor. Everyone conceded that it is first and foremost
there for the local American members..it has to be, it is afterall your
national body, but contest listing/report after contest report proved to be
what everyone down here got bored with.
So I asked more questions..what do they want. As overseas members they
wanted the following:

*	More of a "Global" attitude...lets see some worlds  and continental
reports containing lots of information, pictures, trends analysis etc. lets
face it, the major magazines do nothing, when the K-factor did little or
nothing...you lost at least 4 OS members down here that I know of.
*	The ads and suppliers are vital..all wanted more and actually listed
this as a major factor in joining the NSRCA to read the ads and see whats
available to us pattern freaks. INFORMATION.

*	lets keep the cost realistic,  some of the ideas mentioned before,
like CD's sound quite feasible.
*	guys down here wanted to see more technical content.. I seem to
remember Brian Clemmons wanted to do a plane feature every month...surely he
had some volunteers??
*	More pictures... and finally.. more of a global outlook( again)

While on cost....there aren't going to be any OS members left if the
K-factor is as irregular as it is. Maybe that wont matter to the NSRCA but I
think it would be a shame...lets face it... pattern flyer's are the same all
over the world, no matter where you come from, we are all hopelessly devoted
to it, which is why I see this as an opportunity for the NSRCA to unite
pattern flyers around the world. There has to be a way to bring us all
together and I see the K-factor being the tool to do it with. Lets become so
strong that the FAI shakes in their boots!!!

Sorry for this to be written by a 'scatterbrain' but I'm in a hurry at
work!!

Just some food for thought.

Tom
Canberra, Australia

************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE*  This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or
dissemination of this email or its attachments is
prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES:  Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.
Before opening or using attachments, please check for
viruses.  Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any
affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the
organisation.
************************************************************************

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#