AMA rules-what are we doing?

Jeff Hughes jhughes at hsonline.net
Thu Nov 14 20:53:19 AKST 2002


I guess I'm just missing the point. To some, schedule and practice in intermediate is difficult, but it is not a destination class. If we fly fai at the nats as the top class, logic says that should be the only destination class, not masters. Must be some history here i'm missing.

It really doesn't matter to me, cause I'm a long way from there, just curious is all.
Jeff

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Del Rykert 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:56 PM
  Subject: Re: AMA rules-what are we doing?


  For one because of the schedule and practice requirements. I have never seen stats on how many sponsored pilots fly in which classes. My guess is none in Sportsman or intermediate and maybe a couple in advanced. Rest hang out in Masters/FAI...  Not all are born with a silver spoon in their pocket or have the type of job that allows the large chunk of time to practice and hone the skills for FAI.  This assumes you are trying to be competitive and not just hanging out.
   
       Del K. Rykert
       AMA - 8928 
       NSRCA - 473
       Kb2joi - General 
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Jeff Hughes 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:19 PM
    Subject: Re: AMA rules-what are we doing?


    FAI, why woudn't our top class be flying the international pattern?
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com 
      To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:10 PM
      Subject: Re: AMA rules-what are we doing? 


      In a message dated 11/14/2002 12:31:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, jhughes at hsonline.net writes:


        Subj: Re: AMA rules-what are we doing?  
        Date: 11/14/2002 12:31:46 PM Eastern Standard Time
        From: jhughes at hsonline.net
        Reply-to: discussion at nsrca.org
        To: discussion at nsrca.org
        Sent from the Internet 



        This brings up a good point. Why is Master's considered a destination 
        class? Why shouldn't we point out of Masters just like you do on the 
        way up? 




      Jeff

      and go where?? What would be the point?

      MattK 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021114/2087df62/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list