NATs Participation

[Thomas C. Weedon]

Ahaw, Isn't that just a shame?!


  Some of the reason for lower IMAC attendance last summer may have
  been the enforcement of a noise rule for IMAC birds.

  Ron Lockhart
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Buddy Brammer
    To: discussion at nsrca.org
    Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 6:35 PM
    Subject: RE: Weight Limit


    Tom / Bill

    IMAC attendance was also down at the NAT's last year. Compared to
pattern they had far less participation on a percentage basis of overall
membership than pattern.

    Might be that many IMAC mambers don't compete in contest's?

    Buddy



    >From: "Thomas C. Weedon"
    >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
    >To:
    >Subject: RE: Weight Limit
    >Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:42:19 -0500
    >
    >Bill,
    >The latest that I have heard is that they have experienced some drop
outs
    >after the orginal excitment a few years ago which leaves them around
800
    >members. The IMAC contests up here have been down on attendance over
this
    >last year. Tom Wheeler told me that they were tight on money and could
not
    >afford to publish a magazine without a loss. That's why they were
pushing
    >their on-line issue. Now that they have joined with RC Excellance
magazine,
    >their publishing problems my go away. Just my observations. I still
want to
    >fly IMAC when I have the time. I have 2 good planes (only 80"w.s.
though)
    >Tom W.
    >
    FREE*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021114/61ddcebf/attachment.html