Involving the pattern community as a whole.

Troy Newman troy_newman at msn.com
Wed Dec 11 17:28:14 AKST 2002


What do you mean they are very different.....?

Other than the specific rules in the rule book they are very close....And besides as is evident the role of this group is not to make those rules....


I don't see how they are so different. Give us some specifics?

The airplanes themselves look different but the results are the same....Aerobatic precision. Very few of the competitors even fly the free style I would say 20-30%......I don't see it.


TN

----- Original Message -----
From: GeorgeF.
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:18 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Involving the pattern community as a whole.

At 03:14 PM 12/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Troy,
>I think your dead on.
>I would like to see the two organizations merged into one, Neither is
>large enough or strong enough to have much clout. Together, there would
>be a much better organization in place to promote our common interest.


If you merger IMAC and NSRCA together I'm sure you're going to loose a lot  
of current NSRCA members.   The two disciplines are very different.

Bad move....
George
NSRCA 1046 (not yet renewed)

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to  
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021211/fccee2b7/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list