Annex

[Ron Van Putte]

The AMA president said that the annex proposal had to be withdrawn prior 
to official completion of the AMA Executive Council vote or the proposal 
was 'dead' until the next rule change cycle.  The EC vote was completed 
at noon yesterday.  Any further attempts to submit the annex proposal as 
an Urgent change proposal will have to go through Dave Brown, according 
to Steve Kaluf.  As the proposer, I am unwilling to support any activity 
which would result in a compromise proposal which included approval 
authority over the annex by the contest board.  Individuals are welcome 
to pursue a compromise annex proposal with my permission.

Ron Van Putte


Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:26 AM -0600 Ron Van Putte 
> <vanputte at nuc.net> wrote:
> 
>> Jerry - The way I read AMAs response is that they want control of the
>> maneuver descriptions and maneuver schedules.  Everything else is just
>> window dressing.
> 
> 
> What I heard is that the AMA wants to be sure that all
> the procedures are in place and that NSRCA has a commitment
> to the procedures in order to make them work for all
> pattern competitors (NSRCA and non-NSRCA).
> 
> This seems to me not to be a totally unreasonable request.
> 
>> I won't agree to change the proposal to say that.  End
>> of story.
> 
> 
> OK.  You have the right to withdraw your proposal or to
> let it lapse.
> 
> The NSRCA has the right to make a new proposal addressing
> the issues defined by dialogue with the EC.  Perhaps,
> given the polling data, the NSRCA even has an obligation
> to make a new proposal.
> 
>                         Marty #2874
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to # 
> discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#