Annex

[Jerry Stebbins]

Ron, after reading Eric's input, maybe Steve is trying to ensure that the Committee does not vote down your proposal incorrectly. By that I mean erroneously on content, NOT Merit. If that is true it seems that they ( the AMA Board members )should respond with their concerns,and guidance, and give you a window to revise your proposal to accommodate any valid concerns. The input was rather brief, and would probably need fleshing out for NSRCA to implement it properly. 
I would be willing to help respond, if that is the case, so we can resolve any perceived concerns  they have, and give the Committee an input that is only evaluated on it's Merit, and not voted down because of perceived content/deficiencies. 
I do not how long a window they( the Board ) would give you, but feel they would be reasonable. All you need is to be given a chance to respond to their inputs, submit an updated input,and then they ( the Board ) ensure an early opportunity for the Committee to get it evaluated, and voted on--on it's Merits.
Jerry

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021210/8ede47a6/attachment.html