Annex Proposal

[Ron Van Putte]

Jerry Stebbins wrote:

> Ron, it appears to me that we should let the AMA process run it's 
> course. Let them make their decision based on the facts, and put it out 
> for all to examine. Then we should have the opportunity to demand a 
> truthful, and logical response to the process, and the basis for their 
> decision. The Board is, by definition, supposed to be responsive to the 
> Membership!
> I am against any compromise that has no rationale as to why the proposed 
>  approach is wrong.We have the IMAC precident on our side.If we 
> compromise, then that says our proposal is not sound.
> Because Steve and Dave have some kind of insight, I wonder what/who is 
> driving this decision. I would rather have them ( the Board ) explain, 
> if they reject the proposal out of hand, why they are discriminating 
> between the SIG's, and then we can determine the action, legal or 
> otherwise, that we want to take.

Does anyone not agree with the above?

Ron Van Putte



=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#