Annex Proposal

[Bill Glaze]

I am in full agreement.  Bill Glaze

Ron Van Putte wrote:

> Jerry Stebbins wrote:
>
> > Ron, it appears to me that we should let the AMA process run it's
> > course. Let them make their decision based on the facts, and put it out
> > for all to examine. Then we should have the opportunity to demand a
> > truthful, and logical response to the process, and the basis for their
> > decision. The Board is, by definition, supposed to be responsive to the
> > Membership!
> > I am against any compromise that has no rationale as to why the proposed
> >  approach is wrong.We have the IMAC precident on our side.If we
> > compromise, then that says our proposal is not sound.
> > Because Steve and Dave have some kind of insight, I wonder what/who is
> > driving this decision. I would rather have them ( the Board ) explain,
> > if they reject the proposal out of hand, why they are discriminating
> > between the SIG's, and then we can determine the action, legal or
> > otherwise, that we want to take.
>
> Does anyone not agree with the above?
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#