Bylaws

[David Harmon]

I still have not recieved the Nov K-F. It's ok though...I downloaded it
weeks ago and have already archived it.
I prefer to download anyway so no biggie.
    Dave 586

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Thomas C. Weedon
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 2:34 PM
To: NSRCA Discussion List
Subject: FW: Bylaws


 
Jerry,
All the members were sent a K-Factor for January, February, March,
April, May, June, July, Sept/Oct and November, 2002. If you didn't get
one please call Maureen Dunphy. The March K-Factor had the survey for
the proposed by-laws. By the way, these by-laws were a continuation of
the work started by Troy Newman and his team. A few mods were made based
on the survey vote, and then the By-Laws were written in the final form
and published. Every change was voted upon by the membership. The
District limits were not in the old By-Laws and not in the new, either.
The boundaries for District 2 were changed this summer at the officer's
meeting when Maryland was moved from D1 to D2. That also was published.
The District boundaries have always been set by the NSRCA BOD, and can
change as requested by the membership. There is no need to fix the
boundaries by inserting them in the By-Laws. The NSRCA BOD voted not to
align the NSRCA Districts to the AMA Districts. That also was in the
K-Factor. Maureen published it in her column.
 
Hope that helps;
 
Tom Weedon
 
P.S. Further, at 14.2 bauds per sec, you could down load the new By-Laws
in under a minute.  Try it.

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Jerry Stebbins
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 12:36 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Bylaws


Tom ,thanks for the answer, but::
What March K Factor--just now got first one this year, except for the
handout at the NATS, and it did not mention this.
With my phone line the best I can ever do is 14.2, so therefore  I do
not download anything
What K Factor month was the tally displayed to the Membership?
The fact that there was nothing in them before that defined how the
Districts were established, and structured, does not make the omission
in the new ones correct.
What in the old ones (Bylaws) authorized establishing the Districts as
were previously set. I have heard a lot of discussion in the past about
changing the Districts to match AMA, but there were always excuses/no
rationale for not doing anything.
By the new Bylaws, omissions are kicked back to what AMA has--is this a
new  change?  If not, we have not been operating to the Bylaws in the
past.Why not?
I joined after 1990--so have no record--I wonder who knows they are
there.
Jerry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Thomas C.  <mailto:weedon at wwnet.net> Weedon 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Bylaws

Jerry,
The By Laws revision proposals were in your March 2002 K-Factor, in the
center. It was a tear out that you were supposed to fill out, then tear
out, then insert in an envelope and mail in. Did you do it as requested?
 
The old By-Laws was on our national web site www.nsrca.org for three (3)
years. Did you bother to look or print out a copy? I'll send you a copy
in Word or PDF if you want.
 
The vote was tallied for each proposed change, and only those that were
accepted by the membership was included in the final version.
 
There was nothing in the old By-Laws detailing the boundries of the
NSRCA Districts, nor the number of the Districts.
 
The old By-Laws were last changed on December, 1990. You will find them
in the K-Factor from that date.
 
Hope that helps,
 
Tom Weedon

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021202/e8fd5fb8/attachment.html