[NSRCA-dist8] Contest Scores

Patrick Harris harris7148 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 20:30:46 AKDT 2015


Gordon,

No problem  I agree, I stayed inside and cut and buffed wings and stabs.



On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Gordon Anderson <gaa at owt.com> wrote:

> Sorry I was so far behind! I will try to keep up with things the rest of
> the season…. it was too hot here today to anything outside so it was a good
> day to spend behind the keyboard!
>
> —Gordon
>
> On Jun 28, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Patrick Harris <harris7148 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Gordon,
>
> Thanks for getting the results up and running!
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:13 PM, trexlesh at msn.com <
> nsrca-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>>  Looking at the raw scores can tell you where you are lacking or winning
>> in comparing pilot scores.  To me, the best thing about Gordon's scoring
>> sheets is the running summary of the average scores and points cost of
>> individual maneuvers.  That will instantly tell me where I need to improve.
>>
>> Comparing normalized scores between you and the other pilots is a quick
>> way to see if you are gaining or not, but you have to see where in the
>> sequence that is happening.  The only way to do that is to see the other
>> pilot raw scores in each maneuver.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Tablet
>>
>> ------ Original message------
>> *From: *Karl Watts via NSRCA-dist8
>> *Date: *Sun, Jun 28, 2015 6:46 PM
>> *To: *Gordon Anderson;
>> *Cc: *AK, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY;
>> *Subject:*Re: [NSRCA-dist8] Contest Scores
>>
>> Oh, I did not know I could see raw scores.  This helps as I try to
>> compare my flights to others from another contest.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Gordon Anderson <gaa at owt.com> wrote:
>>
>> Karl,
>>
>> It is kind of hard to do, you can see all the scores on the web site even
>> each pilot's raw scores. I think the best comparison would be the
>> normalized scores but this is not perfect. There has been a lot of debate
>> over normalization. You can at least get a pretty good idea.
>>
>> You can learn a lot looking at the scores and seeing how consistent the
>> pilots are etc. There is a lot to be said for consistency.
>>
>> --Gordon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 5:15 PM, Karl Watts <karlwatt at sarmc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this makes sense.  So I really cannot compare my scores in Redmond
>> contest to how pilots did in the Boise contest?
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Gordon Anderson <gaa at owt.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ok the web site 2015 contest results are posted. I still have to update
>> the district champ rules as per the new rules and post the current results.
>> I will do this later this week I hope. Please check out the site and make
>> sure I have this correct, let me know if you find any errors.
>>
>> Karl,
>>
>> Please reference this link from Redmond:
>> http://www.nsrca.us/contest_results/2015/D8/Redmond/contestResults.XML
>> It shows the standings and has detail you don't see on your score sheets.
>> So here is how the scoring works:
>> 1.) We generally fly 6 rounds and you take your top 4 rounds and sum them
>> to get your final score.
>> 2.) Your score sheets show your raw scores that have had the Kfactors
>> applies.
>> 3.) Your raw scores are normalized to the highest scoring pilot in each
>> round. The highest scoring pilots gets 1000 points and all the other pilots
>> are normalized to this highest score. So if you received a raw score that
>> was 90% of the highest scoring pilot you would get 900 points.
>> 4.) Your four highest rounds are then summed to get your final score. If
>> you look at the link you will see lines through your rounds that were
>> thrown out.
>> 5.) The highest possible total score is 4000 if you win 4 rounds.
>>
>> I hope this makes sense??
>>
>> --Gordon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 4:47 PM, Patrick Harris <harris7148 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Outstanding...thank you.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Gordon Anderson <gaa at owt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> i will as soon as I finish posted all the web updates, should finish in
>>> 10 to 15 mins....
>>>
>>> --g
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Patrick Harris via NSRCA-dist8 <
>>> nsrca-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Gordon or Rex....you want to explain "Normalization"?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Karl Watts <karlwatt at sarmc.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So what is the connection between the scores I get handed to me after
>>>> each round and the ones that determine the places?
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>> Confidentiality Notice:
>>>> This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Trinity
>>>> Health and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It
>>>> may contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any
>>>> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you
>>>> are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to
>>>> the sender regarding the error in a separate email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-dist8 mailing list
>>> NSRCA-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice:
>> This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Trinity Health
>> and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may
>> contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any unauthorized
>> review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender
>> regarding the error in a separate email.
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice:
>> This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Trinity Health
>> and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may
>> contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any unauthorized
>> review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender
>> regarding the error in a separate email.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist8 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist8/attachments/20150629/3960201f/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-dist8 mailing list