[NSRCA-dist8] NSRCA-dist8 Digest, Vol 65, Issue 10

[astropuppy]

I'd also like to point out a lot is at the discretion of the CD.
Circumstances are different at each contest. For instance, Wenatchee is
very sensitive to how long their field is closed to their membership; Or,
the Sun issue at many other sites.

The Classic event needs to be fun and adaptable. Are awards going to be
handed out for it? I envision people entering Classic only; then, hoping in
their car immediately after flying their last round.





On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Patrick Harris <harris7148 at gmail.com>wrote:

> We can actually change as the year goes by.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Raymond C. Gauthier <
> rc.gauthier at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Works for me.. One season will tell us what the interest level really is
>> and if there are things that need tom be tweaked what they are.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Patrick Harris [mailto:harris7148 at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:17 AM
>> *To:* AK, ID, MT, OR, WA, WY
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-dist8] NSRCA-dist8 Digest, Vol 65, Issue 10
>>
>>
>>
>> Ray,
>>
>>
>>
>> We could, but I want to go with what we have for now. I just read what
>> Chip is doing at his Bakersfield contest this year in Classic. Here it is:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1)*Pre-Novice 1980-81 Rule Book* (Any AMA Legal Airplane/Engine/Motor
>> Allowed)
>> 2)*Advanced 1980-81 Rule Book* (Any AMA Legal Pattern Plane/Engine/Motor
>> Allowed)
>>
>> *1982-83 AMA Rule Book will be used*
>> 3) 30K-10 Maneuvers PLUS Take-Off and Landing (1985 or older Design
>> w/Electric or Glow)
>> 4) 42K -12 Maneuvers Take-off and Landing do not get scored (1985 or
>> older Design Preferably Glow 2 cycle)
>>
>>
>>
>> For his first two classes, he is saying "any" plane goes (pattern plane
>> for Advanced). For upper classes he is only using 1985 or older.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think we are good to go with what we have and can easily adjust it
>> after the first contest or two.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Raymond C. Gauthier <
>> retiredwell at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> Again my nickel 's worth. I like the .40 to .60 size definition, but we
>> could have a max wingspan to eliminate electric comparison.
>>
>> Ray Gauthier
>> Sent from iPhone
>> 503-260-4137
>>
>> > On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:37 PM, nsrca-dist8-request at lists.nsrca.org wrote:
>> >
>> > Send NSRCA-dist8 mailing list submissions to
>> >    nsrca-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >
>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> >    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> >    nsrca-dist8-request at lists.nsrca.org
>> >
>> > You can reach the person managing the list at
>> >    nsrca-dist8-owner at lists.nsrca.org
>> >
>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > than "Re: Contents of NSRCA-dist8 digest..."
>> > Today's Topics:
>> >
>> >   1. Re: Classic Pattern (J N Hiller)
>> > <mime-attachment>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NSRCA-dist8 mailing list
>> > NSRCA-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist8 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist8 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist8 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist8 at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist8
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist8/attachments/20140220/df894b20/attachment.html>