[NSRCA-dist7] NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 86, Issue 55

Gary Switala plane.gary at cox.net
Wed May 4 12:28:59 AKDT 2016 

Mmmm,

 

  I wonder why he quit ?

 

From: NSRCA-dist7 [mailto:nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bill Polits via NSRCA-dist7
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 1:00 PM
To: CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 86, Issue 55

 

Gentlemen,

 

I have found having disagreements via the electronic media to lead toward the breakup of relationships. I think this is not the result we want for our district. 

 

I suggest that a neutral party to the disagreement recently being discussed on this email list - maybe a former DVP - arrange a conference call among the parties who are central to the disagreement.

 

Bill Polits

 

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:30 AM, <nsrca-dist7-request at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

Send NSRCA-dist7 mailing list submissions to
        nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        nsrca-dist7-request at lists.nsrca.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        nsrca-dist7-owner at lists.nsrca.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of NSRCA-dist7 digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Championship Points and Methods (Lees,John W)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:29:20 +0000
From: "Lees,John W" <jlees at mwdh2o.com>
To: Steven Lampert <SLampert at client-tel.net>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT"
        <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
Message-ID:
        <0A62419A41917140ADA37165A937BBE121E0BE24 at USEX10MBS01.mwd.h2o>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

+1 (or more)
 John Lees

-----Original Message-----
From: NSRCA-dist7 [mailto:nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Steven Lampert via NSRCA-dist7
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 7:59 AM
To: John Bentley; CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods

Dear John,

I'll bet I speak for many on this list who hope that you will reconsider your decision to resign and help guide us through this difficult and politically divisive period.

I have only known you to act with the utmost in intelligence, restraint, and personal integrity.  I for one, never took your proposal that started this mess as an edict or pronouncement.  I took it as an invitation to discuss and debate options with the goal of finding a solution that could accommodate diverse points of view.

In any case, regardless of what you decide to do, I will always be proud to call you a friend.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: NSRCA-dist7 [mailto:nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:17 PM
To: Frackowiak Tony; CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods

You all will be in control..... Good luck .... no one addressed any of the most important issues of fairness and equality this was just a slam fest. ...
  As much as I would like to serve as the D7 district Vice President , in good conscience I can not continue with this position. The legal ramifications are outside of my  personal comfort zone. Therefore I resign as the D7 District Vice President.
John Bentley
ps Tony now you can possibly  gain control as you wish...



------ Original Message ------
Received: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:04:41 PM MST
From: Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
To: JAMIE SCHOOLCRAFT <jamieschoolcraft at icloud.com>Cc:
"kfactoreditor at gmail.com" <kfactoreditor at gmail.com>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT"
<nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods

Yep, you're right!

On May 3, 2016, at 10:01 PM, JAMIE SCHOOLCRAFT wrote:

> Hot damn Robert just nailed exactly what I've been trying to say all along.
No further comments from me as this is my exact stance as well!
>
> Take Care,
> Jamie
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 3, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Robert E Fish via NSRCA-dist7
<nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>> I believe that in today's world there is not enough personal
>> accountability
and emphasis on the value of good citizenship. To make this comment neutral, I am going to put on the stinky shoes and play the role in this hypothetical scenario.
>>
>> Let's say that I am barred from the Antelope Valley Tailwinds (where
>> I am a
member) for an unspecified egregious behavior(s). I acknowledge this behavior and accept responsibility for my actions, and the consequences therein.
>>
>> The tailwinds hold two contests per year, and they are also the
>> closest to
my home. I cannot go to these contests. Since I am accountable for my behavior, I accept the consequences, among them is the extra burden that I brought upon myself in having to travel further and incur greater costs to participate in a district championship program for my hobby. This extra burden would be to participate in other events to take up the slack of the two Tailwinds events that I am not allowed to participate in due to my inappropriate behavior(s). Flying in model airplane contests is not a right or entitlement, but rather a privilege. If I could not afford the extra expense to travel to the additional contests, this would be entirely my fault, and I would have to live with that fact. It is entirely on me.
>>
>> It would be a great incentive for me to repent in my behavior, and
>> work
diligently to regain my good standing with the tailwinds, firstly to repair my personal reputation, then subordinately to regain the privilege of flying at the Tailwinds facility again, even if it was on a time to time basis for competitive events, and maybe in the future to regain the potential for re-acceptance of membership privileges.
>>
>> Robert Fish
>>
>>
>> From: Chris Fitzsimmons via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> To: Frackowiak Tony <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>; "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT"
<nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 9:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
>>
>>
>>
>> This is your comment Tony... Chip lives in the same area and has a
>> limited
income right? Now he would have to travel further to get his required in..
>>
>> So, with the retaining of the requirement for 4 contests for the
>> Champs,
and the elimination of points from the upcoming BMF contest, which was just to try to help out after your contest was cancelled, plus no points for all BMF contests in the future, it will now be even harder for people of more limited means to compete for the District Champs. How does that make it a "level playing field" for them?
>>
>> I guess it's no problem when you have the means to go to all the
>> events you
want, along with the Nats each year. Not only financially but when you can always travel in a group sharing the load. Not often the case when you're just getting in to pattern. I'm also lucky to have good friends that help me attend contests. Otherwise I could only go to contests that I run or I can return home easily to stay the night.
>>
>> And people wonder why the entrant counts at our contests continue to
dwindle. Or why there are 19 Masters in a 35 entrant contest.
>>
>> Still waiting for my return call, Jon.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> > On May 3, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-dist7
<nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thank you Don. I agree completely with your points about being in
>> > good
standing.
>> >
>> > Tony Frackowiak
>> >
>> >> On May 3, 2016, at 6:49 AM, Donald Fox via NSRCA-dist7 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I understand John?s stand but excluding points for district
>> >> championship from any club is not the answer. I think John needs
>> >> to sit down, take time and rethink his stance. I also think we are
>> >> missing a valid point as to what a pilot in good standing is. Its
>> >> not just being in good standing with the NSRCA and AMA but also to
>> >> be in good standing with the club he or she is competing at. If
>> >> you lack any of these three points, you are NOT a pilot in good
>> >> standing. After all, we are thankful for the clubs that allow us
>> >> to hold pattern contest at there facilities. There are more
>> >> contest in D7 than in most other districts that a pilot in lesser
>> >> standing can make up the difference (If expense and health
>> >> allows). 4 contest, 3 contest, out for district or not, extra
>> >> points for number of contestants, I don?t care. Its all good for
>> >> me. I stand with Jamie on these issues. This discussion is getting
>> >> almost as bad as the presidential race. Wake me when the bull shit
>> >> and flies have left the field and these issues have been resolved.
>> >> Maybe I?ll be back too. Till then, I?ll hang on to
my
>> >> fly swatter.
>> >>
>> >> Donald!
>> >>
>> >>> On 5/2/16, John Gayer via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>> <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
wrote:
>> >>> As an annual participant in District 7 contests  but not a
>> >>> district 7 resident, I offer the following suggestion.
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. It seems clear that any club has the right to ban an
>> >>> individual
from
>> >>> setting foot on the club premises. That does assume that the club
>> >>> has the right to banish anyone. There are cases of clubs on
>> >>> publicly owned land where that is not true.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2. It is also clear that the NSRCA has the duty to set up a fair
>> >>> and equitable means of determining district championships as best
>> >>> they can for their membership. The National has delegated this
>> >>> responsibility
to
>> >>> the DVPs.
>> >>>
>> >>> I suggest the DVP change the point accumulation rules to include
>> >>> the
>> >>> following:
>> >>>
>> >>>    1) All AMA sanctioned club results will be included in the
>> >>> points calculations
>> >>>
>> >>>    2) If a member in good standing with the AMA and the NSRCA is
>> >>> banned from attending a qualified contest the following applies.
>> >>>
>> >>> If the banned member in good standing cannot attend a replacement
>> >>> contest due to scheduling or financial hardship in order to meet
>> >>> the maximum allowable contest results under the rules, then his
>> >>> points for that missing contest will be the average of the
>> >>> contests he did
attend.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't see John's position as an attempt to "punish" a club. I'd
>> >>> be willing to bet most of the attendees attend more contests than
>> >>> the limit. Certainly the many out of district contestants don't
>> >>> care about the status of the district points. Hold a great
>> >>> contest and they will all come (and they have).
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm sure the AMA would just look at the fact that the NSRCA did
nothing
>> >>> to prevent a contest being held or to invalidate the results
>> >>> obtained and say "What's the problem?"
>> >>>
>> >>> John Gayer
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 5/2/2016 9:26 PM, Chris Fitzsimmons via NSRCA-dist7 wrote:
>> >>>> NSRCA district points can not be issued by a flying field club..
>> >>>> Only by an NSRCA event where all can fly..
>> >>>>
>> >>>> C
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On May 2, 2016, at 7:55 PM, JAMIE SCHOOLCRAFT via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>> <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> WELL SAID STEVE!!!!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Take Care,
>> >>>>> Jamie
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On May 2, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Steven Lampert via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>> <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> My problem with John?s position is that if a club, in
>> >>>>>> accordance with its bylaws, acts to expel or ban an
>> >>>>>> individual, then the
NRCA?s
>> >>>>>> decision to invalidate the points from an event hosted by that
>> >>>>>> club effectively penalizes the club for taking action against
>> >>>>>> such an individual.  The club is thus left with the
>> >>>>>> unpalatable options of either tolerating the presence of this
>> >>>>>> individual, or having their contest effectively marginalized
>> >>>>>> and transformed into a glorified fun fly.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I really don?t question the authority of the NSRCA to exclude
>> >>>>>> such
a
>> >>>>>> club from hosting an event that is conducted under the
>> >>>>>> auspices of the NSRCA.  However , within the context of a club
>> >>>>>> sponsored event, I think the NSRCA may be exceeding the
>> >>>>>> legitimate bounds of its authority by effectively punishing a club in this manner.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> What I can?t seem to determine is what is the legitimate scope
and
>> >>>>>> source of the NSRCA?s authority in this regard?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> *From:*NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>> [mailto:nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of
>> >>>>>> *Peter Vogel via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, May 02, 2016 2:11 PM
>> >>>>>> *To:* Chris Fitzsimmons; CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT
>> >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> +1.  Well said Chris!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Chris Fitzsimmons via
>> >>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> No one is really missing out on any points or contest. Let's
>> >>>>>> not forget the BMF contest was not even a contest till like a week ago.
>> >>>>>> The guys up north are actually the main people missing out on
>> >>>>>> a contest. Hence why the Fresno came in to replace it. And then BMF..
>> >>>>>> Great to have two step up.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The issue is the club isn't in charge of district points, they
>> >>>>>> are (as Robert has pointed out) in charge of their affairs.
>> >>>>>> And that's correct.. To me and most others it seems, NSRCA
>> >>>>>> points are not BMFs affair. That belongs to the NSRCA.  The
>> >>>>>> NSRCA is an organization right? If we don't pay them we can't get district points right?
>> >>>>>> Where is that confusing anyone?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I fully understand BMF and their decision. I could care less
>> >>>>>> who they ban... It's about district points and why it is or isn't fair.
>> >>>>>> It's not rocket science and perhaps you should put the shoe on
>> >>>>>> the other foot also. I tried it on.. I returned it to the
>> >>>>>> rightful
owner
>> >>>>>> after thinking about it carefully from the other side.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> (Drops microphone) I'm out ??
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Just kidding. Lighten up ffs.. This is a hobby...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Chris
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On May 2, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>> <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  So, with the retaining of the requirement for 4 contests for
>> >>>>>> the  Champs, and the elimination of points from the upcoming
>> >>>>>> BMF  contest, which was just to try to help out after your
>> >>>>>> contest  was cancelled, plus no points for all BMF contests in
>> >>>>>> the  future, it will now be even harder for people of more
>> >>>>>> limited  means to compete for the District Champs. How does
>> >>>>>> that make it  a "level playing field" for them?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  I guess it's no problem when you have the means to go to all
>> >>>>>> the  events you want, along with the Nats each year. Not only
>> >>>>>> financially but when you can always travel in a group sharing
>> >>>>>> the load. Not often the case when you're just getting in to
>> >>>>>> pattern. I'm also lucky to have good friends that help me
>> >>>>>> attend  contests. Otherwise I could only go to contests that I
>> >>>>>> run or I  can return home easily to stay the night.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  And people wonder why the entrant counts at our contests
>> >>>>>> continue to dwindle. Or why there are 19 Masters in a 35
>> >>>>>> entrant  contest.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Still waiting for my return call, Jon.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Tony
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  On May 2, 2016, at 8:24 AM, joncarter60 via NSRCA-dist7 wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  I also am in agreement with Dale's points. It is simply about
>> >>>>>> having a "level playing field" for the district championship.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Jon Carter
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S? 6 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE
>> >>>>>> smartphone
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  -------- Original message --------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  From: Budd Engineering via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>> <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Date: 5/2/2016 8:15 AM (GMT-08:00)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  To: Olstinske Dale <sanjosedale at gmail.com
>> >>>>>> <mailto:sanjosedale at gmail.com>>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT"
>> >>>>>>  <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  +1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On May 2, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Olstinske Dale via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>>  <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>>  <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I love the BMF contests, one of the highlights of the year. I
>> >>>>>>  would always attend in any event, but I support John?s
>> >>>>>> decision  about district championship points. I really doubt
>> >>>>>> the  attendance would be hurt in anyway, just my opinion.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Dale
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On May 1, 2016, at 4:20 PM, John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>>  <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>>  <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> This is NOT an attack on the Bear Mountain Club/Tony/Leon,
>> >>>>>>  (read my original
>> >>>>>>>> post)  It is a statement of policy, in that  every  and ALL
>> >>>>>>  members of the
>> >>>>>>>> NSRCA and AMA should be able to compete in the district
>> >>>>>>  championships.  Did
>> >>>>>>>> anyone actually read my proposal???? . There should for
>> >>>>>>  pilots with the
>> >>>>>>>> exception of legal actions due to NSRCA or AMA never be an
>> >>>>>>  exclusion to this
>> >>>>>>>> policy.
>> >>>>>>>> I have never said that anyone could not have a contest,
>> >>>>>>  however for that
>> >>>>>>>> contest to be valid there can be no exclusions of pilots
>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>  are in good
>> >>>>>>>> standing with AMA and NSRCA  There will be NO more personal
>> >>>>>>  attacks  nor more
>> >>>>>>>> personal vendettas.  This is only about out district policy
>> >>>>>>  and nothing else.
>> >>>>>>>> John Bentley
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 30 Apr 2016 04:58:39 PM MST
>> >>>>>>>> From: John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7
>> >>>>>>  <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>>>>> To: <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>>  <mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> >>>>>>>> Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> All NSRCA D7 Members. It has come to my attention that
>> >>>>>>  members in good
>> >>>>>>>> standing with AMA and NSRCA are unable to fly at a contest
>> >>>>>>  site. Because of
>> >>>>>>>> this, from this point  no district championship points will
>> >>>>>>  be assigned at
>> >>>>>>>> any
>> >>>>>>>> contest that excludes a member that is in good standing with
>> >>>>>>  AMA and NSRCA.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Now on the discussion about the Championship. The overall
>> >>>>>>  consensus is that
>> >>>>>>>> there should be a single Championship and that Championship
>> >>>>>>  should move to
>> >>>>>>>> different sites within D7. In all fairness  since 4 contests
>> >>>>>>  have been flown
>> >>>>>>>> there will be no change in how points are determined for the
>> >>>>>>  2016 contest
>> >>>>>>>> season.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I have heard lots of talk on how the points are awarded .
>> >>>>>>  Here is my thought
>> >>>>>>>> in how the contest(S) could be more competitive:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 1. Use 3 contests for qualification. Each pilot will be
>> >>>>>>  awarded 33 points for
>> >>>>>>>> attendance plus 1 point for each person they beat in the
>> >>>>>> contest.
>> >>>>>>>> One contest can be used from out of district however that
>> >>>>>>  contest can not
>> >>>>>>>> have
>> >>>>>>>> any points given that is larger than the largest D7 contest
>> >>>>>>  attended.As an
>> >>>>>>>> example if a pilot attended the NATS and beat 30 people but
>> >>>>>>  their largest
>> >>>>>>>> class in D7 was 18 they could only be awarded 18 points
>> >>>>>>>> extra
>> >>>>>>  not 30.
>> >>>>>>>> 2. The championship Contest will  count as 100 points plus 1
>> >>>>>>  point for each
>> >>>>>>>> person beat.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 3.The method for the calculation will be announced no later
>> >>>>>>  than Jan 1 2017
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> John
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>  NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>>  NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>>  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>  NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>>  NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>>  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>  NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>>  NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>>  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics
>> >>>>>> District X
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics
>> >>>>>> (NSRCA)
>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>>> <mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >>>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> >> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> > NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
>> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7

________________________________

This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded links, from your system.

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7


------------------------------

End of NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 86, Issue 55
*******************************************





 

-- 

Bill Polits
bpolits at gmail.com
510-528-2341
510-390-1419 cell

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20160504/4835829c/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the NSRCA-dist7 mailing list