[NSRCA-dist7] NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 86, Issue 13

Mon May 2 12:41:58 AKDT 2016

Tried that. I got yelled at, called a profanity, and then hung up on.

Tony

On May 2, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Bill Polits via NSRCA-dist7 wrote:

> I'd recommend that for the benefit of the district this conversation should be taken off of email, especially group email, and on to the telephone.
> 
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, <nsrca-dist7-request at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> Send NSRCA-dist7 mailing list submissions to
>         nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         nsrca-dist7-request at lists.nsrca.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         nsrca-dist7-owner at lists.nsrca.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of NSRCA-dist7 digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Championship Points and Methods (Jon Bruml)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 18:35:23 +0000
> From: Jon Bruml <jon at techstyles.com>
> To: Robert E Fish <akmotov at pacbell.net>, Frackowiak Tony
>         <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT"
>         <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
> Message-ID:
>         <SN1PR11MB0909AA82E0E1D4FDE0959B60C0790 at SN1PR11MB0909.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> oink
> 
> Jonathan Bruml
> Techstyles Sportswear
> 
> [cid:image001.png at 01CF137A.39C23340]<https://www.facebook.com/TechstylesSportswear>
> 
> From: Robert E Fish [mailto:akmotov at pacbell.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 11:27 AM
> To: Jon Bruml <jon at techstyles.com>; Frackowiak Tony <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>; CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>; CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
> 
> The real "bullshit" here is the continued obfuscation of the facts to mask the continued disrespct for BMF's rights to conduct their business to protect their membership, and the continued elitist cover for the single malfeasant that is the root of the problem to begin with. Yuo are only as good as the company that you keep, and it looks like a swarm of flies are heading your way.
> 
> Woof.
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Jon Bruml via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> To: Frackowiak Tony <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net<mailto:frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>>; "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
> 
> There is no wondering why people aren?t interested in pattern
> Just look at the email traffic in D7 for the past few weeks
> 
> Most intelligent sporting souls would run from this type of shit as fast as they can
> 
> Maybe if the email traffic was about the HOBBY and not the personalities people might be attracted to the HOBBY
> The only thing attracted to bullshit are flies
> 
> Jonathan Bruml
> Techstyles Sportswear
> 
> [cid:image001.png at 01CF137A.39C23340]<https://www.facebook.com/TechstylesSportswear>
> 
> From: NSRCA-dist7 [mailto:nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-dist7
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 9:46 AM
> To: CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
> 
> So, with the retaining of the requirement for 4 contests for the Champs, and the elimination of points from the upcoming BMF contest, which was just to try to help out after your contest was cancelled, plus no points for all BMF contests in the future, it will now be even harder for people of more limited means to compete for the District Champs. How does that make it a "level playing field" for them?
> 
> I guess it's no problem when you have the means to go to all the events you want, along with the Nats each year. Not only financially but when you can always travel in a group sharing the load. Not often the case when you're just getting in to pattern. I'm also lucky to have good friends that help me attend contests. Otherwise I could only go to contests that I run or I can return home easily to stay the night.
> 
> And people wonder why the entrant counts at our contests continue to dwindle. Or why there are 19 Masters in a 35 entrant contest.
> 
> Still waiting for my return call, Jon.
> 
> Tony
> 
> On May 2, 2016, at 8:24 AM, joncarter60 via NSRCA-dist7 wrote:
> 
> I also am in agreement with Dale's points. It is simply about having a "level playing field" for the district championship.
> 
> Jon Carter
> 
> 
> 
> Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S? 6 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Budd Engineering via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Date: 5/2/2016 8:15 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Olstinske Dale <sanjosedale at gmail.com<mailto:sanjosedale at gmail.com>>, "CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
> 
> +1
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On May 2, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Olstinske Dale via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> >
> > I love the BMF contests, one of the highlights of the year. I would always attend in any event, but I support John?s decision about district championship points. I really doubt the attendance would be hurt in anyway, just my opinion.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On May 1, 2016, at 4:20 PM, John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is NOT an attack on the Bear Mountain Club/Tony/Leon, (read my original
> >> post)  It is a statement of policy, in that  every  and ALL members of the
> >> NSRCA and AMA should be able to compete in the district championships.  Did
> >> anyone actually read my proposal???? . There should for pilots with the
> >> exception of legal actions due to NSRCA or AMA never be an exclusion to this
> >> policy.
> >> I have never said that anyone could not have a contest, however for that
> >> contest to be valid there can be no exclusions of pilots that are in good
> >> standing with AMA and NSRCA  There will be NO more personal attacks  nor more
> >> personal vendettas.  This is only about out district policy and nothing else.
> >> John Bentley
> >>
> >> 30 Apr 2016 04:58:39 PM MST
> >> From: John Bentley via NSRCA-dist7 <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> >> To: <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>>
> >> Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Championship Points and Methods
> >>
> >> All NSRCA D7 Members. It has come to my attention that members in good
> >> standing with AMA and NSRCA are unable to fly at a contest site. Because of
> >> this, from this point  no district championship points will be assigned at
> >> any
> >> contest that excludes a member that is in good standing with AMA and NSRCA.
> >>
> >> Now on the discussion about the Championship. The overall consensus is that
> >> there should be a single Championship and that Championship should move to
> >> different sites within D7. In all fairness  since 4 contests have been flown
> >> there will be no change in how points are determined for the 2016 contest
> >> season.
> >>
> >> I have heard lots of talk on how the points are awarded . Here is my thought
> >> in how the contest(S) could be more competitive:
> >>
> >> 1. Use 3 contests for qualification. Each pilot will be awarded 33 points for
> >> attendance plus 1 point for each person they beat in the contest.
> >> One contest can be used from out of district however that contest can not
> >> have
> >> any points given that is larger than the largest D7 contest attended.As an
> >> example if a pilot attended the NATS and beat 30 people but their largest
> >> class in D7 was 18 they could only be awarded 18 points extra not 30.
> >> 2. The championship Contest will  count as 100 points plus 1 point for each
> >> person beat.
> >>
> >> 3.The method for the calculation will be announced no later than Jan 1 2017
> >>
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> >> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> >> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> > NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20160502/84697fad/attachment.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 11890 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20160502/84697fad/attachment.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of NSRCA-dist7 Digest, Vol 86, Issue 13
> *******************************************
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bill Polits
> bpolits at gmail.com
> 510-528-2341
> 510-390-1419 cell
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-dist7 mailing list
> NSRCA-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-dist7

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20160502/aa44c8d4/attachment-0001.html>