[NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals

[Derek Koopowitz]

Thanks for the feedback, Tony.

 

From: nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-dist7-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Frackowiak
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 6:34 PM
To: CA, AZ, HI, NV, UT
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals

 

Fine with 13-2.

Fine with 13-4.

Against 13-6. They should have passed the weight rule by McHarg. They didn't even let that pass the Initial vote.  

Against 13-7. They should have used the wording in the current F3A regulations. Requiring a break to be visible is too much of a bother to enforce. I won't install an arming plug to make this visible and I won't keep my canopy off my model.

Fine with 13-8.

Tony Frackowiak



 

 

  _____  

From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at comcast.net>
To: "CA, AZ, HI, NV,UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, September 1, 2012 11:30:41 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals

Everyone,

 

The final vote on the rules proposals is coming up in less than 2 weeks.  The proposals being voted on are listed here:

 

http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/rcaerobatics.aspx

 

 

Please give me your thoughts and feedback on these proposals…

 

Thanks!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120904/0aa7563b/attachment.html>