[NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals

[Anthony Frackowiak]

Fine with 13-2.

Fine with 13-4.

Against 13-6. They should have passed the weight rule by McHarg. They didn't 
even let that pass the Initial vote.  


Against 13-7. They should have used the wording in the current F3A regulations. 
Requiring a break to be visible is too much of a bother to enforce. I won't 
install an arming plug to make this visible and I won't keep my canopy off my 
model.

Fine with 13-8.

Tony Frackowiak







________________________________
From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at comcast.net>
To: "CA, AZ, HI, NV,UT" <nsrca-dist7 at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, September 1, 2012 11:30:41 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-dist7] Rules proposals


Everyone,
 
The final vote on the rules proposals is coming up in less than 2 weeks.  The 
proposals being voted on are listed here:
 
http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/rcaerobatics.aspx
 
 
Please give me your thoughts and feedback on these proposals…
 
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120904/20b448b6/attachment.html>