[NSRCA-dist7] To all D7 pattern pilots

[Wallace, Bill]

Here is my 2 cents worth - as a Masters pilot who is going to try the FAI sequence this year - I know I will not be flying the F sequence at least until I get more comfortable with the P.  For me, that may be a while.  So to be forced into either flying it or taking zero's is not a great option.  The Gold and Silver idea is fine, but I agree with some of the other comments in regards to the small number of pilots actually attending that would now get split up in to 2 classes.  I could live with that solution if everyone else agrees, but I would rather us just keep the P sequence for this first year and then bring the F back in next year.  I am flying FAI this year for 2 reasons - first the P sequence looked interesting, and secondly, it would mean 1 less Masters pilot to judge.  As a CD, I am very aware of the problems caused by this overloaded class at contests, so I really felt that we might be able to even out the classes a bit with this new P sequence, but I doubt that will happen if we are forced to fly F.  I am willing to go along with what the group comes up with, but if I have the choice - I will be flying P only at my 2 contests this year.

Bill Wallace
Commercial Sales Manager
Bridgestone Commercial Solutions
4000 E. Mission Blvd.
Ontario, CA  91761
Cell Phone - 951-385-2605
Fax number - 615-493-2333

[cid:image001.png at 01CCC9A1.EC4D5370]<http://www.trucktires.com/>[cid:image002.png at 01CCC9A1.EC4D5370]<http://retreadinstead.com/>


This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which is exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from disseminating or distributing this information (other than to the intended recipient) or copying this information. If you have received this in error, please notify me immediately at wallacebill at bfusa.com or at 951-385-2605. Thank you.

From: Jon Carter [mailto:joncarter60 at comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 1:48 PM
To: CA, AZ, HI, NV,UT
Cc: Adrian Wong; Bill Sneed; Wallace, Bill; Dale Olstinske; Derek Koopowitz; Dick Belden; Don Atwood; Frank Capone; Frohreich, Greg; Jarvis Johnson; Jerry Budd; Jim Oddino; krishlan fitzsimmons; kysung at comcast.net; Luke Peng; Lynn Burks; LuvtheRocs at aol.com; rob at koolsoft.com; Robert Gillespie; Ron Davies; completemarine02 at sprintpcs.com; steve hannah; Terry Walker; Tom Messer; 'Jon Carter'
Subject: To all D7 pattern pilots

Happy New Year to all!!!

Here is an e-mail I have been working on for the last month. I am finally sending it out to start the discussion process. If there are pilots who I have missed, please feel free to forward this e-mail to them.

FAI and Masters in District 7: Issues and Opportunities

I want to start some discussion among FAI pilots, Masters pilots and CDs about the FAI and Masters class in District 7. Please keep in mind that this discussion needs to focus on our experience here in District 7. This is a revision to a section of my K-Factor article that will appear in January. Given publication deadlines, I did not have the opportunity to get very much feedback before I had to submit the article! I have since received some feedback which I have added and this e-mail is my attempt to get more.

In 2010 I heard from some of our local FAI pilots that they would like to fly the finals or "F" sequence at local meets. They felt that getting the opportunity to fly judged "F" sequences at our local contests would help them improve their flying and enable them to be more competitive at the Nats. I also heard that "FAI has two sequences so we really should fly them both in order to "really" fly FAI" I polled and spoke to most of the FAI pilots in our district and came up with a proposal. In 2010 we flew two rounds of judged "F" at local contests but if a pilot did not want to fly "F" he could fly "P" for those two rounds with no penalty. (We worked out a K-factor modification in an attempt to score "P" and "F" together)  In 2011 we went one step further and had everyone fly two rounds of "F" at local contests. If a pilot did not want to fly "F" he took a zero for those two rounds. I definitely heard some feedback about that! I think the attendance numbers speak for themselves. In 2009 ("P" only) we had the highest number of pilots fly FAI since I have been the district scorekeeper. At some local contests we had more FAI pilots than Masters. This number dropped in 2010 ("P" and "F" sort of "fudged" together) and it fell even further in 2011 ("P" & "F"). Concurrently, we have a LOT of Masters pilots! This creates real problems for the CDs in balancing the lines, and for the judges, usually FAI and Advanced pilots, who spend way too much time in the chair. I have heard from many pilots this year that they do not have the time or the inclination to fly the "F" sequence but they really enjoy the extra challenge of the "P" sequence. This leads me to a discussion of some proposed solution for 2012. Please keep in mind that we are just discussing proposals at this point.

Option 1

Don't do anything. We continue to fly FAI with 4 rounds of P and two rounds of F. At local contests last year we flew this way and simply counted the best 4 rounds. That way you do not have to "keep" an F score. At the district championships you must keep an F score.

Advantages
Keeps things the same as last year, we continue to fly the "full" FAI pattern.
Gives our local pilots who want to fly at the Nats a chance to fly judged "F" patterns.

Disadvantages
Many pilots don't seem to want to fly F and so they stay in Masters creating a "bulge" that makes the CDs and the contestant judges lives more difficult.
We seem to be having a declining # of pilots in FAI.

Option 2

Go back to the way we did it in 2010 and let some people fly P and some fly F and do some sort of score "fudge".


Advantages
Kind of a middle ground solution. Might get some pilots to leave Masters and try FAI.

Disadvantages
I don't really care for "fudge'ing" scoring. It just doesn't seem right in a competitive sport.

Option 3

Split FAI into two "divisions" let's call them "Gold" and "Silver" these two divisions are competed for and scored separately. Here's a simple description.

FAI "Gold"

This class will fly 4 rounds of the "P" sequence and two rounds of the "F" sequence at each local contest. Their final contest score will consist of their best 3 out of 4 "P" rounds and their best 1 out of 2 "F" rounds. This will also be the format used for FAI "Gold" at the district championship contest. If there is enough interest we could even fly an unknown round at the season championships.

FAI "Silver"

This class will fly 6 rounds of the "P" sequence at each local contest. Their final contest score will consist of their best 4 out of 6 "P" rounds. This will also be the format used for FAI "Silver" at the district championship contest.

A pilot may enter either class at any contest. You cannot fly in both at one contest though! You can change back and forth as many as you want to during the pattern year.

Advantages:
Possibly increase the pilots flying FAI and reduce the pilots in Masters. This will greatly simplify line balancing and judging assignments. Gold pilots are perfect judges for Silver and vice a versa. Masters pilots can judge Gold, Silver or Advanced.
Reduce the length of time spent in the judging chair. Judging 10 Masters pilots is not an easy task and requires you to be in the judging chair for almost an hour and a half. Not very fun at a local contest!
Make the CDs job of finding and assigning judges much easier.
Might improve competition within FAI (Gold and Silver) and Masters.

Disadvantages:
The CD needs to provide one more set of trophies. Extra cost is "bad"!
Depending on who shows up the CD might have extra trophies that he will have to "eat"
Further splits a small pool of competitors. How many pilots will fly "Gold", maybe not enough to have a fun competition?

I think the trophy problem can be worked around. By the time we get to be a Masters or an FAI pilot do we really need to get a trophy at a local contest? I know I don't! A simple group photo or a medal or a simple metal plaque that lists the event and the class would be fine. At my contests this year I intend to simplify the Masters and FAI trophies regardless of what we do with FAI. In regards to the other issues I don't know.

Please bear in mind that I am looking for ideas and proposals. If you are a Masters or FAI pilot and you don't think that anything is "broke" just let me know! If most Masters and FAI pilots think it ain't broke then we won't "fix it"!!! (Option 1) Or if you don't like any of my proposals but have another thought in mind just let me know. So to you FAI and Masters pilots and Cds out there, think about it and please let me hear from you.

Jon Carter
NSRCA D7 VP

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120103/67f53618/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8255 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120103/67f53618/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12900 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-dist7/attachments/20120103/67f53618/attachment-0003.png>