[NSRCA-discussion] Model Identification for FAI starting in 2022

Thu Sep 9 05:34:50 AKDT 2021

We are not that independent of the FAI as much as what you may perceive. I am an AMA competition board member. When we vote on proposed rules changes we do take into consideration what the FAI does. The majority of our rules and regulations are very much in line with FAI. At one time they were not. We do try to make changes that make sense that will enhance and improve competition participation on the regional and national level. Unfortunately, our niche in the hobby has become more and more a sport for those who can throw money at it. FAI, in my personal opinion, is one of the major driving forces to this situation we find ourselves in. The level of complexity we have reached has greatly decreased participation in our sport along with other distractions in our lives. It is basically a $7-10K proposition to have a full blown primary and a backup airframe. Well you say build your own airframe to reduce cost? Not everyone has the time or building skills required.

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

From: Koenig, Tom via NSRCA-discussion<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:21 PM
To: John Decker<mailto:johndecker at sbcglobal.net>; General pattern discussion<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Model Identification for FAI starting in 2022

Interesting that the US chose to be independent of the FAI.

That has me pondering why that is……

I guess it may not be a simple answer, yet probably no different as to why for example, there are so many different “standard’ systems in the world.

The AMA must obviously feel there is an advantage for its members by remaining independent. Could be as simple as the “American Way”??

Tom

From: John Decker <johndecker at sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2021 12:04 PM
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>; Koenig, Tom <Tom.Koenig at iconwater.com.au>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Model Identification for FAI starting in 2022

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are expecting the content or attachment from the sender

Hi Tom,

The AMA is not part of FAI hence we have our own numbers. If an AMA member flies in a FAI event, they would have to have an FAI license. All of our World Championship team members have FAI licenses.

John

On Wednesday, September 8, 2021, 07:22:33 PM CDT, Koenig, Tom via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

Hi all,

Well certainly in Australia’s case, our National Body, the MAAA sits as body, as a member of the FAI (International Governing Body).

As a result, every Modeller in Australia, belonging to any club in the Nation is issued a Sporting Licence, issued by the FAI, Class F Aeromodels-Class S Space Models.

These carry our Licence Numbers. In Australia’s case, an AUS##### Number.

We have been carrying AUS numbers on our models for Decades. Yes…Decades.

Originally we used to carry VH registration numbers. The same as FULL SIZE. You can understand why this had to change.

So, I assume that the AMA is not registered with the FAI and that the US is/has been going it alone? If the AMA is part of the FAI, then why have you all not got your FAI sporting Licence? The sporting licence will have your number.

Tom

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>> On Behalf Of sreyher--- via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2021 10:04 AM
To: Charlie Barrera <charliebarrera767 at gmail.com<mailto:charliebarrera767 at gmail.com>>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Cc: Mark Atwood <atwoodm3141 at gmail.com<mailto:atwoodm3141 at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Model Identification for FAI starting in 2022

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are expecting the content or attachment from the sender

All our competitions in the US are AMA except for the world champs.  I do not believe it affects us.

Sheldon

From: "Charlie Barrera via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
To: "Mark Atwood" <atwoodm3141 at gmail.com<mailto:atwoodm3141 at gmail.com>>, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 5:56:40 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Model Identification for FAI starting in 2022

Thanks Mark. I’ll pass this on to the board to pass on to our members. …Charlie

On Sep 7, 2021, at 3:05 PM, Mark Atwood via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

Please read below regarding Plane markings for FAI competitions starting in 2022.  Our AMA number is no longer valid for those comps.  We must you our FAI issued ID along with USA.

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Peter Uhlig" (via ciam-f3a Mailing List) <ciam-f3a at fai.org<mailto:ciam-f3a at fai.org>>

Subject: [ciam-f3a] FAI ID

Date: September 7, 2021 at 3:59:22 PM EDT

To: SC mailing list <ciam-f3a at fai.org<mailto:ciam-f3a at fai.org>>

Reply-To: peteruhligf3a at aol.com<mailto:peteruhligf3a at aol.com>

CAUTION: Message originated from outside of Paragon. Use caution regarding any links, attachments, credential and financial requests.

Dear Subcommittee Members,
I would like to inform you about a Plenary decision which has been published since 2020 and may cause some confusion.

C.11 IDENTIFICATION MARKS
C.11.1 Class F - Model Aircraft
a) Model aircraft, except for Indoor Free Flight and Scale, shall carry:
i) The national identification mark followed by the FAI Unique ID number. The letters and numbers
must be at least 25 mm high and appear at least once on each model (on the upper surface of
a wing for Free Flight models).
Note: The list of the national identification marks (3 letters per country) is downloadable from
“Documents” section of the CIAM website http://www.fai.org/ciam-documents.
Note: The mandatory carrying of the FAI ID number shall commence in 2022.

During the last years competitors could use National Licence number or FAI ID. From 2022 the unique FAI ID is mandatory. Pilots need to display Country Code and FAI ID on their planes, if they want to take part in an FAI competition.
National licence number caused a lot of confusion because there sometimes were competitors who had more than one. The FAI ID is unique. Whenever anybody had one, he will have it forever, even if the licence isn't valid.
Have a look at an example:

This is noted in the FAI database about my license valid in 2017:
<bicgblhcdfgehfie.png>

<gegnihdhmejnekgd.png>

On my former models I needed GER 384 Country Code+NAC License Number for FAI competitons.

>From 2022 GER 19233 is necessary. Country Code+FAI ID.

May be the NACs will demand to have national numbers on the model for national competitions. But everbody who normally has received an FAI License, has received it via his national federation. So in my opinion the FAI ID may be sufficient for national competitions, too. But this is on behalf of the NACs not to complicate the case. They should use the FAI card above fro printouts. On some licenses issued by some NACs important FAI ID is missing. This should be changed.

Organizers should accept only FAI ID for registration. With an excel file with only these numbers, the FAI Jury can check the validity in very easy way without entering each name into the database.

Please inform the competition pilots and the organizers in your countries to avoid problems at FAI competitions!

Kind regards
Peter

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

******************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please delete all copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or dissemination of this email or its attachments is prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. Before opening or using attachments, please check for viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the organisation.
******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

******************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please delete all copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or dissemination of this email or its attachments is prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. Before opening or using attachments, please check for viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the organisation.
******************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20210909/3cbc9bd7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 3E9F0AB7192A443D92ECFFF7809CD92E.png
Type: image/png
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: 3E9F0AB7192A443D92ECFFF7809CD92E.png
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20210909/3cbc9bd7/attachment.png>