[NSRCA-discussion] Judging question

[Peter Vogel]

   1.

   Downgrades for flying a manoeuvre partially out of the zone should be in
   proportion to the degree of infraction, ie a small part of the manoeuvre
   (10%) flown past a 60 degree line would call for a downgrade of 1 point,
   while more of the manoeuvre (30%, 40%, 50% ...) flown past a 60 degree
   line must be downgraded accordingly by 3, 4, 5... points. If an entire
   manoeuvre including entry and exit is flown out of the manoeuvring zone,
   it consequently must be zeroed. However, violations of a 60 degree line
   that occur near the 150 metre line (ie approximately over a 60 degree flag)
   should be seen less severely than violations along a line further out and
   more distant from the judges.


On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 3:13 PM Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> I agree with Cliff.  I don’t think the current rule book consider to count
> elements out of the box. In any event, there is no time to do it and it is
> not practical.
>
> Vicente “Vince” Bortone
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 4:52 PM Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>> So, how many points do you downgrade?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 5, 2020 4:11 PM
>> *To:* Keith Black; General pattern discussion
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging question
>>
>>
>>
>> I will do a proportion of the square out of the box.
>>
>>
>>
>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 4:01 PM Keith Black via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> Nice question. Sounds like 3/8 this of the maneuver is not acceptable,
>> that leaves you with about a 6. Unless you decide to zero on the grounds
>> that the entire maneuver must be in the box.
>>
>>
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 3:26 PM Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> During a judging discussion recently, a question came up that I would
>> like to get input from the group.  Setup: A centered square loop (as if
>> there could be a turnaround version) is flown with the upper radii and
>> horizontal line flown out of the box.  The other elements are perfect.
>> What is your downgrade for the box violation?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



-- 
Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20200705/d936e9b3/attachment.html>