[NSRCA-discussion] Nats chronicle article

[Maureen Dunphy]

Amen Dan.

On Sat, Jul 4, 2020, 6:04 PM Daniel Underkofler via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> I try to have a different perspective that I think is important to the
> longevity of our hobby.
> Rather than try to determine fault, or what the proper decision
> is/are/were, we must remember that our NSRCA representatives are
> VOLUNTEERS.  We don't typically have contested elections, so we take
> whomever is willing.  As such, I believe they should be cut a lot of slack
> and given the benefit of any doubts.  They are donating their time and
> energy.  If they get too much crap, for whatever reason, they'll bail.
> Potential candidates will also have cause to hesitate before stepping up to
> fill future vacancies.
>
> I intended to go the the Nats this year and was certainly disappointed
> in things.  However, let's let this be water under the bridge.
> Dan U
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:45 PM Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>> A different view.  Here is my take on this subject.  If you are pleased
>> with what your representatives have done, don’t click on the link.
>>
>>
>>
>> Canceled NATS <http://donramseypattern.com/Canceled_NATS.pdf>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Charlie Barrera via NSRCA-discussion
>> *Sent:* Saturday, July 4, 2020 7:19 AM
>> *To:* Monte Richard; General pattern discussion
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Nats chronicle article
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to clarify my remarks in the article that I wrote in the July
>> KFactor. Monte Richard's resignation as ED for the NATS was not the reason
>> for the cancellation of the NATS. Monte is one of the pillars in this
>> pattern community. His hard work and dedication to our sport is second to
>> none. Monte was wedged between the AMA and NSRCA. I blame our dilemma on
>> the AMA not making a timely decision concerning the conduct of the NATS.
>> The AMA informed the SIGS, that, if they were not going to participate in
>> their respective NATS, to send a letter to the AMA stating their
>> non-participation by the 24th of June. This was clearly stated on the SIG
>> conference call that was held with the AMA on June 12. A letter by the
>> NSRCA had not been sent when, inexplicably, entrants fees were refunded on
>> June 17. When this action occurred, it was obvious that we could not
>> recover the NATS. This is what killed our NATS. After this, the NSRCA
>> looked for alternate plans to have a NATS. Several venues and locations
>> were researched, including Blytheville, AR, Muncie, IN, and Crowley, LA.
>> Event organizers were contacted by the NSRCA to possibly have the event.
>> With this year being Team Trials, it is important to pick our USA team for
>> the World competition next year, and having this during a rescheduled NATS
>> made sense. The NSRCA contacted the Cajun NATS to possibly have the NATS in
>> October during their NATS and have the Team Trials at the same time. Monte
>> did not solicit the NSRCA...the NSRCA asked him for assistance. This was
>> not clearly stated in my article. However, the NSRCA has found a suitable
>> venue for the Team Trials. They will be during the D4 Championship contest,
>> September 25-27, 2020. They will be in Muncie, IN. Judges from each NSRCA
>> district will be solicited, and we will pick a team. My sincere apologies
>> to Monte for this misunderstanding. ...Charlie Barrera, President, NSRCA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/03/2020 11:32 AM, Monte Richard via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>>
>> There is so much wrong with that article, compare it to the published BoD meeting minutes. The Pattern Nats were canceled be the AMA only once, on June 15th by vote on the motion to honor the Sig’s withdrawal. My resignation as ED did NOT drive a nail in the coffin. The BOD’s representative deserves that honor, by insisting the AMA cancel the Pattern Nats.
>>
>>
>>
>> I did not offer to hold the team trials in Crowley at the Cajun Nats. Charlie called me and asked if I would do that. I told him that I wanted it clearly understood that I didn’t offer this, but that the BoD requested it of me. I agreed if they decided this I would, but told him the Blytheville offer would be better.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Chronicle article has many other issues and errors that a simple comparison to the published minutes exposes.
>>
>>
>>
>> If anyone put a nail in the coffin of the Nats, it was the action of the NSRCA representative who attended the Friday AMA phone call prior to the June 15th AMA vote.
>>
>>
>>
>> Monte
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone(c) 2020 Compass Engineering & Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. This electronic transmission, and any attachments hereto, is intended only for the use of each individual recipient named above and may contain information belonging to the sender that is confidential, proprietary, is subject to copyright, constitutes a trade secret or is legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately (i) notify the sender, (ii) permanently delete the original and all copies of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto, and (iii) destroy all printouts of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto. Please note that electronic transmissions to and from the sender may be monitored by the sender's employer. Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20200705/cdc81080/attachment.html>