[NSRCA-discussion] new rules proposals

[Daniel Underkofler]

I was thinking that 10% was a bit high.  Could also do a lower % or Int
than Sportsman.

John, I hope the idea of any of these rules proposals is NOT to allow the
lesser pilot to win!
We just are talking about leveling the playing field to account for
equipment.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:32 PM John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Monte
>
> I sort of arbitrarily picked 10%.    Do the math and suggest a better
> number.   Although I think the idea is that the newcomer should have a good
> chance of placing/winning even though he/she may not be the best pilot.
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Monte Richard via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Friday, January 18, 2019 3:18 PM
> *To:* Monte Richard; General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] new rules proposals
>
>
>
> I just went into one of last years contests in intermediate. Pilot one’s
> first round scored a raw score of 350 and 331, his average raw score was
> 340.5 (he won the round). Pilot two’s raw score for round one was 338 and
> 324.5, his average raw score was 331.25, add in the 10% handicap and it
> becomes 364.375. This moves him to first place in the round by a high
> margin. Totally changes the results. Add to that the normalizing and it
> becomes almost insurmountable, considering pilot one outflew pilot two.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Monte Richard <
> mrichard at compassengineering.com> wrote:
>
> Add in the Kfactors and in Sportsman the total raw score can be 250 making
> the 10% handicap 25 points.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2019, at 2:28 PM, Monte Richard via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> 10% is a lot. sportsman has 18 maneuvers so a perfect flight has a
> possibility of 180 points in raw score, 10% of that is 18 points. A flight
> with all 9’s would be a raw score of 162, 10% is 16.2 points. That pretty
> much means a pilot without the 10% advantage has to beat the pilot with the
> advantage by 1 point per maneuver on all the maneuvers to beat him, if they
> tie more than 2 maneuvers, then the handicap beats him. 10% is a high
> factor to overcome.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Daniel Underkofler via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> John,
>
>  I think you've got a wording problem in your -05 proposal.
>
> You say: 10% when "length/width DOES exceed 71in"
>
> I think you meant: 10% when" length AND width DO NOT exceed 71in"
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 6:46 AM John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> FYI for all.
>
>
>
> There are 3 new rules proposals on the AMA website.    Suggest folks take
> a look.
>
>
>
> John Fuqua
>
> cell 850-974-6655
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> (c) 2019 Compass Engineering & Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. This
> electronic transmission, and any attachments hereto, is intended only for
> the use of each individual recipient named above and may contain
> information belonging to the sender that is confidential, proprietary, is
> subject to copyright, constitutes a trade secret or is legally privileged.
> If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this transmission in error, please immediately (i) notify the
> sender, (ii) permanently delete the original and all copies of this
> electronic transmission and all attachments hereto, and (iii) destroy all
> printouts of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto.
> Please note that electronic transmissions to and from the sender may be
> monitored by the sender's employer. Thank you for your cooperation.  ­­
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> (c) 2019 Compass Engineering & Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. This
> electronic transmission, and any attachments hereto, is intended only for
> the use of each individual recipient named above and may contain
> information belonging to the sender that is confidential, proprietary, is
> subject to copyright, constitutes a trade secret or is legally privileged.
> If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this transmission in error, please immediately (i) notify the
> sender, (ii) permanently delete the original and all copies of this
> electronic transmission and all attachments hereto, and (iii) destroy all
> printouts of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto.
> Please note that electronic transmissions to and from the sender may be
> monitored by the sender's employer. Thank you for your cooperation.  ­­
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20190118/ffe9d95e/attachment.html>