[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging workload, on my soapbox

Maureen Dunphy maureendunphy4 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 22 17:44:44 AKDT 2018


Great information Bob.

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018, 7:07 PM Bob Kane via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> First off, let me say thank you to Al Glenn and Peter Vogel for their
> heroic efforts at the 2018 NATS. Unless you wear the shirt you have no idea
> how tough the job is.
>
> I heard more than once last week "I judged once, I should not have to
> judge".  Lets look at the numbers:
>
> 2018 NATS pilots (and potential judges):
>
> FAI   32
> Masters 23
> Advanced 11
> Intermediate 6
>
> 72 total pilots
>
> Judging requirements
>
> FAI Prelims
>
> 3 Judges, 2 lines, 2 sites = 12/day, 24 judges for 2 days.
>
> FAI Semis
>
> 5 Judges, 1 line, 2 sites = 10 judges
>
> FAI Finals
>
> 24 judges
>
> FAI, total of 58 judges needed
>
> Masters Prelims
>
> 3 judges, 2 lines, 2 sites = 12/day, 36 for 3 days.
>
> Masters Finals
>
> 5 judges, 3 lines      15
>
> Masters, total of 51 judges neeed.
>
> Intermediate 2 judges, 2 lines 3 days  12 judges
> Advanced 2 judges, 2 lines 3 days  12 judges
>
> 133 Total judging assignments during the week.
>
> Assuming you do not use Intermediate pilots as judges, simple math would
> show 133 assignments / 66 judges = 2.01 judging assignments/pilot.
>
> However, number is reduced by the pilots actually flying in the Semi and
> Final rounds, so the number is more than 2.
>
> People leave during he week, further reducing the pool.
>
> I know people who judged 4+ times during the week. The only thing I can
> say is thank you for your service.
>
> This should not be the NATS Event Director's problem.  It is ours to
> solve.
>
> I would be happy to volunteer on a committee commissioned by the NSRCA to
> look at this and come up with a plan for the 2019 NATS.
>
> Off my soapbox.
>
> Bob Kane getterflash at yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20180723/e6a85a37/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list