[NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's
Vogel, Peter
Peter_Vogel at intuit.com
Tue Nov 14 10:13:32 AKST 2017
Money! Judges at WC are compensated and have their Travel paid. What you describe would mean 2-8 more judges at a WC.
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Jeff Worsham via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:10:08 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's
What would it take for FAI to require a minimum # of zero judges at future WC’s? IE: at least two designated zero judges required for every semi’s and finals round. With the increase in complexity of maneuvers in F and unknown sequences, sounds like the judging load may be exceeding what even the most experienced of judges can keep up with at a WC. On top of increased judging load, add poor visibility, poor conditions, etc and the chance for error goes up even more.
Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20171114/0a144c7e/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list