[NSRCA-discussion] Removing FAI F from local contests

[DaveL322]

Go Lester!   Go Team USA! 
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5.
-------- Original message --------From: Earl Haury <ejhaury at comcast.net> Date: 7/19/17  2:35 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: DaveL322 <DaveL322 at comcast.net>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Removing FAI F from local contests 



The options for F3A being discussed are available to the CD for any 
contest, decide what the local folks want and announce it beforehand as per the 
rules. No reason to “legislate” the F sequence away, I suspect that the F3A 
pilots in the Gulf Coast D6 region (average of 6 for 12 contests, high of 8 
& low of 3) would rather fly all F. Certainly a larger range of scores and 
easier to differentiate. For those uncomfortable with taking on F (real skill 
builder), then Masters is probably best for them – whatever sequence they hammer 
out.
 
It wasn’t that long ago that Masters was a huge class. Where’d everyone go? 
Life changes? Dissatisfied with sequences? Pretty sure very few moved to F3A 
which had a much shorter P sequence than Masters and F wasn’t all that 
tough.
 
BTW – humble brag – my son Lester made the 2018 F2D WC Team last weekend. 
Interesting that those folks have 32 entries in their TS. 
 
Earl


 

From: DaveL322 via NSRCA-discussion 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:05 PM
To: rixsweeney at gmail.com ; General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Removing FAI F from local 
contests
 

Allow F as an option for rounds 5 and 6 and you get the best of both worlds 
with the benefit of making it easier to separate top F3A flyers when more than 
one is at a local contest, which is not uncommon in some parts of the US. 
 

Regards,
 
Dave
 
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy 
Note5.
 

-------- Original message --------
From: rixsweeney--- via NSRCA-discussion 
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Date: 7/19/17 11:44 AM (GMT-05:00) 
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Removing FAI F from local contests 
 

Perhaps removing FAI F from local contests would solve a few 
issues discussed on this list:

  Current Masters flyers who 
  are advocating for the Masters schedules to adopt FAI P as the Masters 
  schedule could just move up and fly FAI knowing they will not be required to 
  fly the F pattern. That makes them happy. 
  Current Masters flyers who 
  think adopting FAI P is a bad idea can rest easy as nbr #1 above takes FAI P 
  for Masters off the table. 
  Current FAI flyers who have 
  no one to compete against at local contests because of F,  will now have 
  a few competitors that will undoubtedly move up.   
  If even one or two Masters 
  flyers move up it will ease the judging issue. 
  If FAI guys that want to 
  get some F practice for the NATS or Worlds, they can accomplish that at the 
  practice field, and or another option…A CD could optionally add some F demo 
  flights during a contest and have Masters and FAI guys judge and score them. 
  These would be demos and would not count as a contest flight but allows FAI F 
  guys to get some judging exposure. I have no doubt some of the FAI guys who 
  don’t fly F would be willing to Judge the one or two FAI F guys or even a few 
  Masters flyers. These F demo flights could be flown at days end on either day 
  or however a CD wants to fit them in. Lunch break perhaps.  
 
I know first hand that a few FAI guys insist on flying F at 
local contests so they get judging exposure and as a result they have no one to 
play with.  
 
For this to work, all CD’s in all districts would need to 
adopt removing F from all local events. I am seeing many benefits to flying P 
only, locally. 
 
Rick
 
 
 
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 
10
 


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing 
list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170719/2e0dabae/attachment.html>