[NSRCA-discussion] Current Masters pilots question

[Vicente Bortone]

Hi Jon

There will be more chance to have two groups of high level pilots helping
to judge each other's and other classes in local contests.  We are
overloading or in some cases running out of judges in local contest.  I
explained other reasons earlier.

VB



On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:50 PM John Pavlick via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> You guys need to get your sh#t together and FAST. After all of this latest
> B.S. the guy who helped me get started in Pattern (A VERY good / dedicated
> / proficient Masters pilot) has just taken himself off the list AND left
> the NSRCA. Something to think about.
>
>
>
> John Pavlick
>
> Cell: 203-417-4971
>
>
>
> [image: idslogo2]
>
> Integrated Development Services
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Joe Lachowski via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:26 PM
> *To:* vincebrc at gmail.com; justanotherflyr at gmail.com; Jon Lowe <
> jonlowe at aol.com>; General pattern discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Current Masters pilots question
>
>
>
> If the sequence committee had followed what was done by the previous
> sequence committees going back at least 4 cycles  for Masters we would not
> be discussing this issue ad nausium. We still have until December 31st. Get
> a new committee together and get this right. It isn't too late. I obviously
> wasted many hours putting together a document that would keep the sanity in
> the sequence process. Obviously it failed.
>
>
> My head is spinning and like my bud Ed Alt, I am about to unsubscribe from
> this list too. I wonder what AMA leadership would think if they were
> following this discussion list?
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:14 PM
> *To:* vincebrc at gmail.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org;
> justanotherflyr at gmail.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Current Masters pilots question
>
>
>
> Then why fly FAI locally? I don't get it.
>
> Jon
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
>
>
> You still fly Masters at the Nats.  It is pilot options as always has
> been.
>
>
>
> VB
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:58 PM Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> 2-Masters. Reason? Because if I go to the Nats, I fly at least 6 rounds,
> more if I make a finals. In FAI, I would likely only get 4 in P. Not worth
> the time and expense to go.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> --
>
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> <#m_3691001336021723256_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170718/0d3d2b30/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 735 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170718/0d3d2b30/attachment.png>