[NSRCA-discussion] Current Masters pilots question

[Joe Lachowski]

If the sequence committee had followed what was done by the previous sequence committees going back at least 4 cycles  for Masters we would not be discussing this issue ad nausium. We still have until December 31st. Get a new committee together and get this right. It isn't too late. I obviously wasted many hours putting together a document that would keep the sanity in the sequence process. Obviously it failed.

My head is spinning and like my bud Ed Alt, I am about to unsubscribe from this list too. I wonder what AMA leadership would think if they were following this discussion list?
________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:14 PM
To: vincebrc at gmail.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org; justanotherflyr at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Current Masters pilots question


Then why fly FAI locally? I don't get it.

Jon


________________________________
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:

Jon,

You still fly Masters at the Nats.  It is pilot options as always has been.

VB

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:58 PM Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
2-Masters. Reason? Because if I go to the Nats, I fly at least 6 rounds, more if I make a finals. In FAI, I would likely only get 4 in P. Not worth the time and expense to go.


Jon
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170718/e4c8d272/attachment.html>