[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced

Scott McNickle nelson_jett at comcast.net
Mon Jul 10 13:28:14 AKDT 2017


Nooooooooo!!

Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App



------ Original Message ------

From: Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion
To: Charlie Barrera, General pattern discussion
Sent: July 10, 2017 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced

I guess we should now talk about the proper entry of a snap, and what qualifies an actual snap !! lol 😁😂


Matthew E Finley
Q.C.I Technical Assistant
248-794-8487 mobile



-------- Original message --------
From: Charlie Barrera via NSRCA-discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: 7/10/17 4:36 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Joe Walker<vellum2 at bellsouth.net>, General pattern discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced

Negative snaps are a piece of cake, once you have the airplane set up properly. It’s a matter of going "to the corners” ... down elevator and opposite rudder and aileron. A little awkward when learning, but becomes very natural after a few tries. …Charlie


> On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:47 PM, J via NSRCA-discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)>wrote:
> I don't think they are more difficult at all... often easier IMO.
>  
> Joe
>  
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:16 PM, S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)>wrote:
>  
>  
> In my experience, and that of my Master's Class buddy Bill, negative snaps are different and more difficult to get right.
>  
>  
> Not sure why, but they are.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Scott,
>  
>  
> D4
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> > On July 10, 2017 at 1:07 PM Peter Vogel via NSRCA-discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)>wrote:
> >  
> > I actually very much like the new intermediate sequence particularly because it adds 4 point roll elements, which helps to bridge the difficulty gap between intermediate and advanced.
> >  
> > Quite frankly, from a snap roll perspective, I'm not sure how negative and positive are different other than which corners I need to bury my sticks into...
> >  
> > Peter+
> >  
> > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Verne Koester via NSRCA-discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)>wrote:
> > > There hasn't been much said about the proposed Advanced schedule. It appears to me to be an improvement and more appropriate skill level schedule than the current one with one exception.
> > > We rarely hear from existing Intermediate pilots on Advanced schedule proposals. I suspect that's mostly because they have no experience yet in the skills they'll have to gain once they move up. Those of us who have taken that step need to consider what they're facing.
> > > So if I'm an Intermediate pilot moving up to Advanced, I'm going to have to learn, having never done them before, the slow roll, 4-point roll, snap, and spin. I'd argue that this is the single hardest transition in pattern.
> > > Now we're going to throw a negative snap in for good measure?????
> > > COME ON, MAN!!!!
> > >  
> > > Verne Koester
> > >  
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)
> > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > --
> > Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
> > Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
> > Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
> > Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics (NSRCA)
> >  
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org(mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org)
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170710/9f8c643c/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list