[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed masters sequence thoughts
John Gayer
west.engineering at comcast.net
Sun Jul 9 09:03:14 AKDT 2017
Joe,
Who is actually on the committee?
I know of Sean, Derek, Stuart, Jim, Don, Mark.
Who am I missing?
Have a happy Sunday
John
On 7/9/2017 10:28 AM, Joe Walker via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
> Good afternoon all,
> For those interested, the most current Sequence Committee Charter and
> Guidelines are posted on the website for your perusal. Enjoy!
>> On Jul 9, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Jas S via NSRCA-discussion
>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't been paying attention to this cause I don't fly Masters,
>> although I did hear about some crazy maneuvers that were added that
>> even I thought was too much for Masters. But Matt, be careful what
>> planes you include on your list of capable ones. I'm flying my Acuity
>> through F and taking it to the Nats 😁
>>
>> Jas iP
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion
>>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the NSRCA or Sequence committee planning, or going to plan
>>> in order to cater to the 95% and not the 5% of world class capable
>>> FAI Flyers? All of the sequences, and direction seems to be
>>> prepairing everyone for FAI... If someone wishes to fly FAI, than
>>> great..... Masters is the AMA's highest class, so in my OPINION all
>>> AMA sequences through advanced should be prepairing pilots for that,
>>> and not FAI....
>>>
>>> It is very clear that is not the case....
>>>
>>> Whats discuraging is Power hungry manuvers, and the attitude that in
>>> order to perform the sequence you have to buy a 3k or higher plane
>>> to be competitive.
>>>
>>> ALL SEQUENCES SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE FLOWN COMPETITVELY WITH AN
>>> ACUITY, VANQUISH, MONOLOG, ETC..... Something under a years
>>> salary......
>>>
>>> My Two Pennies
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthew E Finley
>>> Q.C.I Technical Assistant
>>> 248-794-8487 mobile
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170709/53f1e519/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list