[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed masters sequence thoughts

[Joe Walker]

Good afternoon all,
For those interested, the most current Sequence Committee Charter and Guidelines are posted on the website for your perusal.  Enjoy!

> On Jul 9, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Jas S via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> I haven't been paying attention to this cause I don't fly Masters, although I did hear about some crazy maneuvers that were added that even I thought was too much for Masters. But Matt, be careful what planes you include on your list of capable ones. I'm flying my Acuity through F and taking it to the Nats 😁
> 
> Jas iP
> 
>> On Jul 9, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> 
>> What is the NSRCA or Sequence committee planning, or going to plan in order to cater to the 95% and not the 5% of world class capable FAI Flyers? All of the sequences, and direction seems to be prepairing everyone for FAI... If someone wishes to fly FAI, than great..... Masters is the AMA's highest class, so in my OPINION all AMA sequences through advanced should be prepairing pilots for that, and not FAI.... 
>> 
>> It is very clear that is not the case.... 
>> 
>> Whats discuraging is Power hungry manuvers, and the attitude that in order to perform the sequence you have to buy a 3k or higher plane to be competitive. 
>> 
>> ALL SEQUENCES SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE FLOWN COMPETITVELY WITH AN ACUITY, VANQUISH, MONOLOG, ETC..... Something under a years salary...... 
>> 
>> My Two Pennies 
>> 
>> 
>> Matthew E Finley
>> Q.C.I Technical Assistant
>> 248-794-8487 mobile 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170709/c04b8269/attachment.html>