[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?

Jas S justanotherflyr at gmail.com
Wed Jan 25 09:22:35 AKST 2017


There is one. The pilot with an 'over weight' can now compete at the Nats

Jas iP

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> Come on now!  How can hobby shops make some $$$ on a customer who needs to “buy some lightness” if the weight limit is thrown in the trash?
> 
> I hope that all readers realize that my tongue was firmly in my cheek when I posted the above.  There is no advantage in R/C aerobatic competition for a pilot to fly a heavy airplane.
> 
> Ron Van Putte
> 
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I think its time to throw the weight limit in the trash.  There is nothing keeping anyone from voluntarily spending half of a paycheck to drop a few grams.
>>  
>> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of blotch44026--- via NSRCA-discussion
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:56
>> To: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?
>>  
>> +1
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: Joe Lachowski via NSRCA-discussion 
>> Sent: Jan 24, 2017 5:04 PM 
>> To: General pattern discussion 
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle? 
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know when the next rules proposal cycle begins?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I think it is time to stretch the weight limit to at least 4 ozs over 11 lbs. for electrics in ALL the AMA classes. Tired of paying the proverbial  $100 and ounce to get there. Glow setups have an advantage. No doubt in my mind.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Flame on.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170125/e732d603/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list